Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

LauNaMu pfp
LauNaMu
@launamu
Thoughts? What if we experimented on proactive grants with prediction markets? Could this help us aggregate better data to make decisions on how to allocate funds to future outcomes for public goods? Is someone already doing this? If that’s you share your program below! πŸ‘‡πŸ½Or send me a dm!πŸ“©
6 replies
4 recasts
14 reactions

WebOfTrust pfp
WebOfTrust
@weboftrust
Vitalik wrote about it but the harsh reality is it won't work. optimism rpgf has made is clear that when $$ is involved, defination of public goods could be changed just to fulfill your bias. Years of research and literature clearly defines what public goods are.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

WebOfTrust pfp
WebOfTrust
@weboftrust
On top of that, a major challenge will be finding consensus on whether the goal was achieved or not, development related proposals are easy to validate while engagement/onchain is impossible.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

LauNaMu pfp
LauNaMu
@launamu
Retro and proactive funding are very different. I don't believe prediction markets are very needed in Retro funding unless you're looking to provide debt to the players. In which case, incentives and information assymetries are very different.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction