Varun Srinivasan
@v
We should make this a protocol moat, not a Warpcast moat.
5 replies
2 recasts
31 reactions
Dan | Icebreaker
@web3pm
That would be nice, but it’s tricky to do even if you want to… Seems like Warpcast will always want to improve algo to surface most relevant content, meaning minimizing false negatives at the expense of false positives (from a bot detection pov) But at the protocol level, it is problematic to publish a list with a high false positive rate bc then mistagged users get angry So the challenge is that even if you want to do this, Warpcast (and any client) will still have an incentive to add their own tweaks to their algos, and the largest one will have a data advantage This isn’t meant as a criticism of Warpcast, just an observation of what seems to be equilibrium end state. Would love to be wrong!
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction