Ryan pfp

Ryan

@wasserbrunner

53 Following
7 Followers
Ryan pfp
Ryan
@wasserbrunner
The idea was over time, as the infra is built, crypto would become less degenerate scams. Instead, right now at least, it feels the opposite has happened. Honestly Silk Road even feels like peak Bitcoin.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ryan pfp
Ryan
@wasserbrunner
VIRTUALS PROTOCOL IS A SCAM. IT IS A MEMECOIN LAUNCHPAD WITH A CHATBOT IN THE CORNER.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ryan pfp
Ryan
@wasserbrunner
This app continues to shock me at the lack of reach. The Algo is absolute garbage
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ryan pfp
Ryan
@wasserbrunner
Not sure who needs to hear this, but Virtuals is a scam. It’s just a meme coin launchpad with ponzinimics and an ai chatbot in the corner.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ryan pfp
Ryan
@wasserbrunner
Read “Sample 1”
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ryan pfp
Ryan
@wasserbrunner
So this is the description on the Virtuals app if you click “good examples” while “creating an ai”. Wtf?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ryan pfp
Ryan
@wasserbrunner
Eth bulls, the weak hands have been shaken out. Washed clean. Hold on tight
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ryan pfp
Ryan
@wasserbrunner
FWIW (nothing considering no one seems to see any of my casts), I’m not paying $10 to renew this. I’m sure this will be the first to get a response. “No one cares” to which I would reply “exactly”
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ryan pfp
Ryan
@wasserbrunner
This app is incredible. 0 engagement on any cast. NICE
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ryan pfp
Ryan
@wasserbrunner
Has anyone done research on polymarket or prediction markets in general on how accurate they are? As in look at events that are at, say, 75% yes right before the event happens. And is it right exactly 75% of the time?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ryan pfp
Ryan
@wasserbrunner
Can someone enlighten me— how is it ok that it takes 7 DAYS for a transaction on an optimistic rollup to be secured by ethereum? Until that point, it’s in limbo only secured by a few “trusted validators”? Serious question, and I’d love to be missing something
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ryan pfp
Ryan
@wasserbrunner
P.s. In SCIENCE that’s called a hypothesis, and has no basis on whether it’s TRUE or not.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ryan pfp
Ryan
@wasserbrunner
But you’re a scientist right you read papers for a living so you must not be totally full of shit right?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ryan pfp
Ryan
@wasserbrunner
Meanwhile exactly zero studies have found any link in vaping to cancer. So scientific of you to assume it does LMAO! https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/about-cancer/causes-of-cancer/smoking-and-cancer/is-vaping-harmful#:~:text=But%20levels%20are%20usually%20low,evidence%20that%20vaping%20causes%20cancer.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ryan pfp
Ryan
@wasserbrunner
Hahahaha peer reviewed science. You’re such a clown. Yeah sure man like your other peer reviewed science about how vaping MAYBE COULD POSSIBLY cause cancer but it’s inconclusive?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Ryan pfp
Ryan
@wasserbrunner
Heres an excerpt from your study genius “The long-term cancer risk linked to e-cigarette usage is yet unknown. On the other hand, the review will provide the investigator with more recent information on e-cigarettes.” HAHAhaha. You were the one projecting about “studies don’t convince anyone” hurrrr
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ryan pfp
Ryan
@wasserbrunner
You are an insufferable moron posting fake facts on the interwebs.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ryan pfp
Ryan
@wasserbrunner
Switching to Vaping will save or extend your life if you’re a chain smoker. Misinfo plagues the discussion leading smokers to stick with smoking.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ryan pfp
Ryan
@wasserbrunner
that’s what I thought. There is no paper. Because vapes don’t cause any illness unless you consider nicotine addiction an illness.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ryan pfp
Ryan
@wasserbrunner
Hahahahaha. Ok link the paper
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction