Ryan pfp

Ryan

@wasserbrunner

53 Following
7 Followers
Ryan pfp
Ryan
@wasserbrunner
Eth bulls, the weak hands have been shaken out. Washed clean. Hold on tight
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ryan pfp
Ryan
@wasserbrunner
FWIW (nothing considering no one seems to see any of my casts), I’m not paying $10 to renew this. I’m sure this will be the first to get a response. “No one cares” to which I would reply “exactly”
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ryan pfp
Ryan
@wasserbrunner
This app is incredible. 0 engagement on any cast. NICE
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ryan pfp
Ryan
@wasserbrunner
Has anyone done research on polymarket or prediction markets in general on how accurate they are? As in look at events that are at, say, 75% yes right before the event happens. And is it right exactly 75% of the time?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ryan pfp
Ryan
@wasserbrunner
Can someone enlighten me— how is it ok that it takes 7 DAYS for a transaction on an optimistic rollup to be secured by ethereum? Until that point, it’s in limbo only secured by a few “trusted validators”? Serious question, and I’d love to be missing something
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ryan pfp
Ryan
@wasserbrunner
P.s. In SCIENCE that’s called a hypothesis, and has no basis on whether it’s TRUE or not.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ryan pfp
Ryan
@wasserbrunner
But you’re a scientist right you read papers for a living so you must not be totally full of shit right?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ryan pfp
Ryan
@wasserbrunner
Meanwhile exactly zero studies have found any link in vaping to cancer. So scientific of you to assume it does LMAO! https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/about-cancer/causes-of-cancer/smoking-and-cancer/is-vaping-harmful#:~:text=But%20levels%20are%20usually%20low,evidence%20that%20vaping%20causes%20cancer.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ryan pfp
Ryan
@wasserbrunner
Hahahaha peer reviewed science. You’re such a clown. Yeah sure man like your other peer reviewed science about how vaping MAYBE COULD POSSIBLY cause cancer but it’s inconclusive?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Ryan pfp
Ryan
@wasserbrunner
Heres an excerpt from your study genius “The long-term cancer risk linked to e-cigarette usage is yet unknown. On the other hand, the review will provide the investigator with more recent information on e-cigarettes.” HAHAhaha. You were the one projecting about “studies don’t convince anyone” hurrrr
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ryan pfp
Ryan
@wasserbrunner
You are an insufferable moron posting fake facts on the interwebs.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ryan pfp
Ryan
@wasserbrunner
Switching to Vaping will save or extend your life if you’re a chain smoker. Misinfo plagues the discussion leading smokers to stick with smoking.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ryan pfp
Ryan
@wasserbrunner
that’s what I thought. There is no paper. Because vapes don’t cause any illness unless you consider nicotine addiction an illness.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ryan pfp
Ryan
@wasserbrunner
Hahahahaha. Ok link the paper
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ryan pfp
Ryan
@wasserbrunner
But they don’t. I don’t vape or smoke but nic vapes arnt linked to any serious illness
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ryan pfp
Ryan
@wasserbrunner
Well they don’t give you cancer or any illness so there’s that
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ryan pfp
Ryan
@wasserbrunner
I can’t find a straightforward answer to this question. What percentage of txns are bots?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ryan pfp
Ryan
@wasserbrunner
I am somewhat obsessed with ethereum, and have nothing to do onchain. Polymarket would be fun but Im not interested in having to use a vpn just to use it.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ryan pfp
Ryan
@wasserbrunner
They should not have to be “big names” just people who are likely not spammers themselves
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ryan pfp
Ryan
@wasserbrunner
But the base payment is in a stable coin. You still likely have to on-ramp then off-ramp the funds. That’s a large fee
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction