gm, most of the health advice on the internet is harmful

e.g., "don't use sunscreen" or "avoid fluoride in toothpaste"

first leads to skin cancer, second leads to more cavities

whenever someone is trying to give you health advice, ask for peer reviewed research

cto @ bwl.gg (lunchbreak.com), 80M+ users (bdut.ch) 🙏 built @remindme, @mintit, @gpt, @healthbot, farcantasy.xyz

/ted | exploring the onchain frontier | surfing @ venice, ca | eating @ gjusta / gjelina

Porto Seguro, State of Bahia, 45810-000, Brazil

enjoy your life and do things the way that you can safely get a full night sleep without waking up worrying about anything!

yo i'm in my clubbing era, what health advice can you give me to settle down?

there is no research on exclusive use of nhap as compared to fluoride

nhap is great after dental surgeries

will it do the trick without fluoride?

we don't know yet

Btw, related to toothpaste: try Apagard royal. It can be combined with fluoride ones (or used exclusively) and has a 10% concentration of nhap for dental remineralization

ffs there is no nuance

no sunblock is 100% effective

whatever good parts there are, they get through the sunscreen without the risk of cancer

The sunscreen one deserve more nuance though. Sun is very good for you, there is a balance between sun exposure and protection 

@operator & /operator | building future.news | BCI, bioinformatics, search, chaos, decentralized AI

no one questions that it is questionable

no paper is 100% perfect

but it is *the closest* we get to the truth

the alternative to peer-reviewed data is either no data or non-peer-reviewed data

both are terrible

peer review itself is also questionable. the best is having a biostats PhD friend with OCD who loves answering questions lol

I thought they should just ask you since you know all of it and are always right?