Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
W1NTΞR
@w1nt3r
gm! @zherring and I have revised our Nouns prop https://www.nouns.camp/candidates/level-up-auction-ux-with-nouns-terminal-1e79b045dc29eae9fdc69673c9dcd7c53e5e159d We're overflowing with ideas of daily experiences that could really mesh well with Nouns auctions!
4 replies
1 recast
52 reactions
Ben
@jarmen
Don't like 20e for nouns, basically getting a gifted large voting block. Strongly against
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions
supriyo
@supriyo.eth
bid bot network is good direction!! incentivised bidding is interesting too! ⌐◨-◨
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Michael Gingras (lilfrog)
@frog
Hey Winter, I love the work here. What are your thoughts on beefing up the client incentives and asking nouns terminal to be a player in the client incentives game? Right now we have many clients all competing to be the “de facto” new auction client and I think it would be more fair to lean into client incentives rewarding clients for their work so the rewards are distributed to all clients as they bring in users. Funding this prop up front feels unfair to the other clients who are competing. What might it take for this to seem like a worthwhile path for your team? Would we need higher client incentives? More transparency around how that works? Thanks for the proposal, I really like your tool and the work you’ve put into the space.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Ben
@jarmen
Additionally, I'm not convinced the issue at auction is the fact people have to attend an auction. Most valued and aligned people will want to celebrate the winning. Think it's an over spend to drop this level of funding on an action for the 1% of nouns-aligned people. While you also are giving it to the big bad people you claim to be stopping.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
