Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
On storage - Don't overthink it since casts you like or reply will likely be pruned at some point - Farcaster's explicit goal is *real-time* global state. - I fully expect people to offer paid (or free with ads) archiving services, a Wayback Machine type thing, etc.
23 replies
24 recasts
102 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
And you can always buy more storage if you're a preservationist.
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
vrypan |--o--|
@vrypan.eth
Preservationist here. What I'm worried about is not so much the increasing cost of preserving my activity over the years. I'm concerned that in many of the FIP-2 use cases, I will not be able to preserver fc activity that's important to me.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
vrypan |--o--|
@vrypan.eth
For example, comments on my blog posts. How can I preserve comments from every single user that used FIP-2 to comment on my blog? Or likes on my 15-minutes-of-fame cast? These are not mine, and don't even belong to a single user I could buy storage for.
4 replies
1 recast
3 reactions
Ghostlinkz
@ghostlinkz.eth
This is a huge problem for the outcasters.xyz newsletter. @paragraph has integrated fc replies as comments. Im also linking back to Warpcast app for each curated cast.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Just save the comments within the app?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
vrypan |--o--|
@vrypan.eth
If you have to implement something like this, you could probably use a web2 commenting form. There are advantages to using fc, but the value proposition starts to look less attractive. What if there was a way to purchase storage units not just for a user's messages, but also other messages that interest someone?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
vrypan |--o--|
@vrypan.eth
Even if it was just a simple "preserve message with hash xxxxx" message, I could see third party services that I configure to preserve all likes on my casts, all casts with parent_url in a specific domain, etc. For me this would be great.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction