Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Valerie
@vrose.eth
Since there's been a lot of curiosity about how three different scoring / labeling models compare, I pulled some data. Here's a contour plot of the Neynar Score, vs log of OpenRank score, color coded by Warpcast Label.
8 replies
13 recasts
60 reactions
Valerie
@vrose.eth
The main conclusion is that all three models are very different. The Neynar score and Warpcast labels correlate the most, especially on users with Neynar score above 0.8 (both models agree these are not spam).
3 replies
0 recast
8 reactions
Valerie
@vrose.eth
Here's a scatterplot version. It's harder to see the overlap of the three categories because there are so many points covering up other points, but there's no smoothing or interpolation. This makes the spike in Neynar score at 0.5 more apparent. I think it looks like a whale holding a ski pole, lol.
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
Valerie
@vrose.eth
The spike in Neynar score at 0.5 is because that is the default score for new accounts. Until there is sufficient activity in the account, the score stays at 0.5. The rationale is that, when an account has done very very little, we basically have no signal. These accounts also tend to have the lowest engagement scores.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions