Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
IA
@ia
to the institutional funds and asset managers here: which custody solutions are you currently using or planning to use for RWAs?
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Alex Palmer
@thatalexpalmer.eth
Hmmmm not sure if many of them are here, but does this help? Breakdown of the market by custody solutions that are used by serious players.
3 replies
0 recast
3 reactions
vrohlfs
@vrohlfs
Sick insights! Where are you pulling this from? Private labeling from external sources maybe?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Alex Palmer
@thatalexpalmer.eth
This is my personal workspace! I think I got these from private and public reports. 🤔 There aren’t that many firms compiling data.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
vrohlfs
@vrohlfs
Nice! For RWAs we might get more in the realm of infra + custodian solutions, with vast majority still in private consortia networks (planning public releases eventually)
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Alex Palmer
@thatalexpalmer.eth
Nice that’s awesome! We’ve been building infra for public chain custody of securities in the US (think along the lines of DTCC, eventually). Got a v1 releasing shortly. Everything is OSS. Public goods > private oss/acc > enterprise
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
vrohlfs
@vrohlfs
The cap table format is interesting. I do have to check out TAP docs in depth (first time hearing about it). When you say v1 release, are there institutions already committed for using it. Very cool if so, and would not be surprised
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Alex Palmer
@thatalexpalmer.eth
Docs are currently a little shit (they’re on me, and I’ll update them soon). It’s brand new! Jun 2023 had first commits I think? Yes, being used by 1 SEC registered transfer agent; 2nd on the way. Working on putting ~$100M of assets on the protocol this year.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
vrohlfs
@vrohlfs
Good stuff! Keep going.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
