Content pfp
Content
@
https://opensea.io/collection/dev-21
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Volky pfp
Volky
@volky.eth
I can't seem to be convinced by proponents of Tailwind. Sure, it's easier to maintain CSS with the utility-first approach, but it makes for terribly unreadable code. Trading off readability for writeability is a hard sell. You read orders of magnitude more code than you write it.
3 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

freeatnet 🗿🎩  pfp
freeatnet 🗿🎩
@freeatnet.eth
Could you define "terribly unreadable code"? Curious to hear what you're comparing it to and where the tailwind approach fails.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Blake Burgess pfp
Blake Burgess
@trinitek
They're really expecting you to lean into encapsulating components as part of your JS framework. This is a familiar approach to XAML-based UI frameworks on desktop and mobile.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Elie pfp
Elie
@elie
You don't need to be convinced. You just need to use it. Felt weird to me at first too, but Tailwind is way more readable than CSS/classes. Because it's in one file. Show a modern dev a React/Tailwind file and they can read it. And don't have to jump through multiple files to understand what's happening.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction