Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Welcome to @vitalik.eth, co-founder of Ethereum! 
 He’s kindly agreed to do an AMA. Reply with your questions. :)
186 replies
103 recasts
440 reactions

Hexidethmal 🟪 pfp
Hexidethmal 🟪
@hexidethmal
I’m a little bit of a broken record on this on WC, but I’d like to know his sense of urgency and mitigation thoughts on quantum supremacy w/respect to Ethereum, as I think it’s closer than commonly anticipated.
2 replies
0 recast
4 reactions

Vitalik Buterin pfp
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
Account abstraction (ERC 4337) gives us a clean path to making users' accounts quantum-proof. For existing accounts, if QC comes suddenly we may have to do a hard fork where you can recover your EOA by ZK-STARK-proving your 12-word seed (that's already quantum-proof and should cover most users).
2 replies
3 recasts
18 reactions

Vitalik Buterin pfp
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
For the consensus layer, STARK-based alternatives to (i) BLS aggregation, (ii) Verkle trees, (iii) KZG-based DAS are all being actively explored.
1 reply
2 recasts
6 reactions

Hexidethmal 🟪 pfp
Hexidethmal 🟪
@hexidethmal
I did not know EOA was already effectively quantum proof, and it sounds like account abstraction with 4337 has more utility than I’d thought at first. Ty!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction