Vitalik Buterin pfp
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
https://chat.openai.com/share/f7ad44ba-f00c-41b8-b0b1-8763795724a5 This is probably the most serious phail I've seen from gpt4 in a while. That said, it's still impressive! Only one year ago these kinds of phails were the norm; the fact that I'm now surprised by it is a sign of progress!
11 replies
5 recasts
54 reactions
Shin pfp
Shin
@hiteam
Why is GPT and even bard so bad at mathematical calculations? Anything that involves numbers they give out varying results everytime
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Mac Budkowski ᵏ pfp
Mac Budkowski ᵏ
@macbudkowski
If everyone who made a mistake was as nice as GPT-4...
1 reply
0 recast
7 reactions
Dan | Icebreaker pfp
Dan | Icebreaker
@web3pm
This is novel… You managed to train ChatGPT in this convo to interpret any and all Vitalik responses as superior to its own. Generally a good heuristic for ChatGPT but like all good heuristics, ChatGPT overapplies.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0xLuo pfp
0xLuo
@0xluo.eth
Previous research shows that GPT-4 has shown a decline in intelligence. Its success rate in solving prime number problems dropped from 97.6% to 2.4% between March and June. GPT may still exhibit significant randomness and unpredictability in mathematical reasoning. https://twitter.com/svpino/status/1681614284613099520
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Joe Blau 🎩 pfp
Joe Blau 🎩
@joeblau
This is the same energy we have in our group text when someone shares something that was already shared earlier that day… “Scroll up”
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dean Pierce 👨‍💻🌎🌍 pfp
Dean Pierce 👨‍💻🌎🌍
@deanpierce.eth
Remember that ChatGPT is very explicitly bad at math by design 😆 Always enable the Wolfram plugin if you care about math being accurate in your conversation. https://chat.openai.com/share/9ad9cecd-a5f7-4399-9617-3dfea0fd14cd
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
dusan pfp
dusan
@ds8
the patience! you would make a great primary school teacher.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
padpad pfp
padpad
@padpad
you have a very gentle way of talking and guiding the superhuman oracle bot
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
waz pfp
waz
@itswaz.eth
“Maybe actually do the division checks one by one?” 💀
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
abranti pfp
abranti
@abranti
ChatGPT works much better for these type of questions when it can use a calculator (or write a python script).
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
m00npapi.eth pfp
m00npapi.eth
@m00npapi.eth
It missed some basic stuff w law of cosines on me the other day, hallucinations happen frequently it’s just easier to see with precise stuff like math
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction