Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
In multiple European cities now I see taxis being allowed to use the bus lane (while of course regular cars are not). What's the policy justification for this?
112 replies
680 recasts
3287 reactions
Mark 🎩
@web3withmark
Public service vehicles. The more we use the less pollution. Is this not obvious?
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
But taxis are cars and have about as many end-user occupants as regular cars, so it seems like they would pollute as much as any other cars?
1 reply
0 recast
7 reactions
Mark 🎩
@web3withmark
I would say that usually - especially in business hours - regular cars will have single occupants and according to to the U.S. Department of Energy, the average occupancy rate for personal vehicles in the U.S. is about 1.67 passengers per vehicle. In the uk we tv campaigns that suggest taking buses or taxis/car share to reduce the amount of single person emissions However the before mentioned article also says “Traditional taxis typically have higher emissions per mile compared to personal vehicles due to lower fuel efficiency and more time spent idling.” So perhaps I’m completely wrong. I’ve always held the believe that public transport is better for the environment - I could just be brainwashed by the media. Now I’m doubting everything.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Daniel Aguilar
@protozoo
I'm guessing they are more environment-friendly since a single taxi will, in a given day, provide transport to multiple users who might otherwise use their own (multiple) cars. If this is true (not sure if it is; those multiple drivers would probably drive only a tiny fraction of the time, while the taxi is driving ALL the time, regardless of whether it carries passengers or not)... so, if that assumption of taxis being more environment-friendly is true, then applying policies that encourage using such service seem rational (reserved lanes = faster trips = more demand of taxis = less cars in the road). But in the end, who knows... So many dumb policies out there
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
