Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Vitalik Buterin pfp
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
How do people feel about "strong L2" vs "light L2" as umbrella terms for things with unconditional security (rollups, plasma, channels) vs things with partial security (validiums, pre-confirmations...) that's still better than a multisig? See discussion: https://twitter.com/VitalikButerin/status/1747374271717138827
34 replies
11 recasts
96 reactions

Vitalik Buterin pfp
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
Copying over this diagram from a few months ago: Proposing to rename "security-favoring" and "scale-favoring" to "strong" vs "light", to be more succinct.
4 replies
1 recast
7 reactions

Varun Srinivasan pfp
Varun Srinivasan
@v
strong vs fast maybe? light simply sounds... worse than strong.
1 reply
0 recast
7 reactions

shazow pfp
shazow
@shazow.eth
How about "anchored" vs "floating"? Or "strict" vs "loose".
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

tudor pfp
tudor
@tudor
let s let security for the base layer, ethereum and let the l2 s be more scalable 🐵
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Varun Kumar pfp
Varun Kumar
@vkcs
Assured L2 vs Expansible L2
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction