Vitalik Buterin pfp
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
https://twitter.com/WSJTech/status/1755774564896756101 This feels very counterproductive? Like, from an "AI safety" perspective, scaling current techniques to even bigger compute -> earlier superintelligence -> more risk. And from an "AI openness" perspective, it increases the divide between megacorps and plebs.
20 replies
81 recasts
524 reactions
Gribs pfp
Gribs
@0xgribber
honest question, what’s the alternative path?
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Les Greys pfp
Les Greys
@les
I feel like this smashes very good with @vgr post today. https://warpcast.com/vgr/0xe66d76a6
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
BORED 🥱 pfp
BORED 🥱
@bored
At this point it just feels like propaganda trying to siphon American tax dollars to OpenAI as some kind of national defense weapon…
1 reply
0 recast
6 reactions
:omer pfp
:omer
@omer
e/acc perspective: faster agi = better?
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
matthewb.eth ↑ 🎩 pfp
matthewb.eth ↑ 🎩
@matthewb
Agreed, it feels like an absurd amount of capital for a singular entity to potentially deploy, corporate or otherwise.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Lex Sokolin pfp
Lex Sokolin
@lex
This reads like ego to me. You can’t centrally plan the right industry structure. Imagine a $7T telecom fund in 2000.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Martin pfp
Martin
@koeppelmann.eth
Counterproductive for whom? It seems you assume that Sam has the same goals as you. My take is that he overestimates his own abilities and underestimates the complexity of human needs and wants, thus coming to the wrong conclusion: that more power for him is also good for humanity.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Trish🫧 pfp
Trish🫧
@trish
I don’t have a wsj subscription anymore so read elsewhere. Absolutely no mention of the harm being done to people in the countries like Congo where the resources to make semiconductors are abundant. It feels deeply problematic and dystopian. Especially because isn’t he a hardcore prepper. Did WSJ mention anything?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Nico pfp
Nico
@sneeks.eth
definitely has room for opening that divide on the other hand, any investment in diversifying semiconductor production can be a good thing
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
▫️Onyx 📚🎩 pfp
▫️Onyx 📚🎩
@cipherscript.eth
Perhaps the solution lies in leveraging blockchain to distribute AI's capabilities more widely - we'd be nurturing an ecosystem where innovation flourishes without being confined to tech juggernauts. Let's 'democratise AI' for a transparent, equitable framework that's aligned with wider societal good.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
bashobits 🚅✨🔵↑ pfp
bashobits 🚅✨🔵↑
@bashobits
it’s all backwards: “open” = closed “safety” = risky
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Metaphorical Leo 🎩🔵 🧾 pfp
Metaphorical Leo 🎩🔵 🧾
@hyp
All ego.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Joely 🎩🏰 pfp
Joely 🎩🏰
@joely
The idea we have to remember everything is not really helping, is it? Especially when humans are equally good at forgetting! 🫣
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
agusti 🐘 pfp
agusti 🐘
@bleu.eth
sam just wants to have the cake, eat it too, and then buy a shit ton extra cakes just in case 😂
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction