Vitalik Buterin pfp
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
https://twitter.com/WSJTech/status/1755774564896756101 This feels very counterproductive? Like, from an "AI safety" perspective, scaling current techniques to even bigger compute -> earlier superintelligence -> more risk. And from an "AI openness" perspective, it increases the divide between megacorps and plebs.
14 replies
58 recasts
683 reactions
Gribs pfp
Gribs
@0xgribber
honest question, what’s the alternative path?
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Les Greys pfp
Les Greys
@les
I feel like this smashes very good with @vgr post today. https://warpcast.com/vgr/0xe66d76a6
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
BORED 🥱 pfp
BORED 🥱
@bored
At this point it just feels like propaganda trying to siphon American tax dollars to OpenAI as some kind of national defense weapon…
1 reply
0 recast
6 reactions
:omer pfp
:omer
@omer
e/acc perspective: faster agi = better?
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
matthewb.eth pfp
matthewb.eth
@matthewb
Agreed, it feels like an absurd amount of capital for a singular entity to potentially deploy, corporate or otherwise.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Martin pfp
Martin
@koeppelmann.eth
Counterproductive for whom? It seems you assume that Sam has the same goals as you. My take is that he overestimates his own abilities and underestimates the complexity of human needs and wants, thus coming to the wrong conclusion: that more power for him is also good for humanity.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Califfo pfp
Califfo
@califfo
I vehemently oppose the unchecked increase in AI computational power. It heightens risks and widens the gap between corporations and the public. We must address this inequality for responsible AI progress.
0 reply
1 recast
2 reactions
Ford Perfect pfp
Ford Perfect
@ford
Counterproductive for humanity, not for the few...
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
goansil pfp
goansil
@goansil
hello
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Ichimoku pfp
Ichimoku
@ichimoku
Good
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
David Salami pfp
David Salami
@david-of-earth
I suspect you don’t even need $7trillion dollars to get to AGI
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Robin pfp
Robin
@rmd
Curious if you think his successfully raising in the trillions would ignite an even larger tech boom than seen in the past?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Lex Sokolin pfp
Lex Sokolin
@lex
This reads like ego to me. You can’t centrally plan the right industry structure. Imagine a $7T telecom fund in 2000.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Art Vandal 🎩 pfp
Art Vandal 🎩
@ciaobella
AI safety is a concern. But I don't see how this (specifically) widens the gap between corporations and plebs more so than any capitalist investment. Having an abundance of AI chips will only make them more affordable and lower the costs of AI cloud services.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Trung Thanh (David) Nguyen pfp
Trung Thanh (David) Nguyen
@trungthanh
Try TrustKeys with Web3 and AI
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
freeman pfp
freeman
@thefreeman
This is Silicon Valley. It’s never about safety or openness. It’s only about the money. The only path forward is decentralized AI with Bittensor and Morpheus
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Kimo pfp
Kimo
@kimo
Don't call us plebs, vitamin.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Vitalii pfp
Vitalii
@sammvm
Omg pizza
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
syentist pfp
syentist
@syentist
> earlier super intelligence -> more risk Why? Seems like an unfair default framing Earlier super intelligence = automated crop production, faster therapies for chronic illnesses, life extension, colonisation of near space etc all of which dramatically extend humanities p(survival beyond the next 100 years)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction