Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
AMA
217 replies
210 recasts
366 reactions

zach roth pfp
zach roth
@zachroth.eth
what is an actual killer consumer use case for onchain that you think will break into the mainstream/normies for REAL, beyond speculation?
1 reply
0 recast
7 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Payments and credentials
1 reply
0 recast
21 reactions

Vitalik Buterin pfp
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
What is the payments use case where crypto has the strongest durable advantage?
4 replies
1 recast
16 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
I'm a big believer in the @balajis.eth barbell idea: crypto is really good for extremely large and small payments. I think extremely large payments are less frequent, so on total volume / people impacted pov, I would imagine frequent, really small payments is more likely to be something that crypto does well. Also bullish on the idea that AI agents will transact in / prefer crypto.
4 replies
1 recast
37 reactions

casslin.eth pfp
casslin.eth
@casslineth
My pov: makes lots sense for 1) cross border payments; 2) programmable payments e.g.@sablier
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Vitalik Buterin pfp
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
3) Intra-country payments in cases where the local financial system is too corrupted / collapsed 4) Any payments in cases where either the sender or the recipient is using crypto as SoV, which is something that makes sense to do for a number of reasons (eg. also having to do with limited/unstable banking options)
4 replies
0 recast
3 reactions

Vitalik Buterin pfp
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
I suspect (4) is a bigger category than (3). The reason is that to use a network to _send_, it has to work only once, but to use a network to _hold_, you have to be confident that it will keep working for a very long time.
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions