34 replies
147 recasts
395 reactions
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions
Do you understand that youāre (rightfully, ofc) praising open source as a way to āreduce the risk of proprietary lockinā, yet donāt seem to acknowledge the huge lockin that Etherscan has as a block explorer?
Weāre trying to break that with the Verifier Alliance, an initiative started by Sourcify, us, blockscout and other smart contract verification providers, but until the EF gets a precise stand, every chain will continue to use and want Etherscan as the default and (in some cases) the only block explorer ābecause itās the default on Metamaskā (I literally got this as a reason a few weeks ago)
Some chains even tell us that getting Etherscan is āEthereum alignedā, hence they donāt choose us or any other explorer, for that matter.
Would love to talk to you about this topic, that It really delicate and not discussed enough (Iām trying to talk about it as much as possible from my side) 0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
