Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Vitalik Buterin pfp
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
Cross-posting a thought on staking from the other app: ------ Perhaps we should recognize that 32 ETH is much more of a barrier for stakers than bandwidth reqs, and temporarily do a trade where we up the bandwidth reqs a bit and in exchange drop the staking deposit minimum to eg. 16 or 24 ETH. It's net-good for both staking accessibility and scale. Then once we figure out peerdas, bandwidth reqs go back down, and once we figure out orbit SSF, the deposit minimum can drop to 1 ETH.
30 replies
17 recasts
172 reactions

Mac Budkowski ᡏ pfp
Mac Budkowski ᡏ
@macbudkowski
+1, it's easier to find a good Internet connection than lock in $80k
2 replies
0 recast
27 reactions

misha  πŸͺ¨ pfp
misha πŸͺ¨
@mishaderidder.eth
agree, already solo staking validating Gnosis - if it would be 1 ETH would start solo staking Ethereum today
1 reply
0 recast
7 reactions

Matthew pfp
Matthew
@mpryor.eth
Imagine the jump in validator count 😁
0 reply
1 recast
2 reactions

Sophia Indrajaal pfp
Sophia Indrajaal
@sophia-indrajaal
Lowering the cost to stake would be massive. If Ethereum wants to be Web 3.0, making it more accessible to further decentralize and increase security has to be a priority.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Icetoad 🎩 πŸ• 🎢 🐈 πŸ’š pfp
Icetoad 🎩 πŸ• 🎢 🐈 πŸ’š
@icetoad.eth
While we are in the subject of staking, when the Pectra update is done (I know it's sounding like it will be a 2 piece update), won't increasing the amount of ETH allowed per node lower the number of nodes out there? Doesn't that run counter to the (I assume) goal you have with this bandwidth/ETH tradeoff you are suggesting in this cast?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

ash pfp
ash
@ashmoney.eth
this would be great for many users, especially those of us in emerging markets.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

πŸ¦’ pfp
πŸ¦’
@srijan.eth
+1
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Jason pfp
Jason
@chaskin.eth
+1
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Apex777 pfp
Apex777
@apex777.eth
I like this. There is want from people to participate in staking who don't have 32 ETH, but might have 8 or 16 to spin up a node. look at the success of /rocketpool -- huge community of stakers under the 32ETH barrier.
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions

Otoro πŸ¦‰ πŸ”΅ pfp
Otoro πŸ¦‰ πŸ”΅
@otoro
On the other hand, 32 ETH is real skin in the game.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

kripcat.eth 🎩 pfp
kripcat.eth 🎩
@kripcat.eth
πŸ™‹β€β™‚οΈ I’d solo stake if the requirement was lowered. Unless you got involved in the space before 2021, acquiring 32 ETH is unachievable for the average person in the developed world, and ludicrous for almost everyone in the developing world.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

max β†‘πŸŽ© pfp
max β†‘πŸŽ©
@baseddesigner.eth
the internet in Lisbon is super fast but 80k is enough to live for more than 2 years here lol I could look into it when minimum is at 1 ETH though
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

ben pfp
ben
@scheinberg
I agree. While the 32 Eth is the most visible cost, there is also a cost to get a home system set up and configured. Everyone values their time differently so lowering the capital costs in ETH and increasing the technical requirements could net increase the amount of independent solo stakers
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

aliX pfp
aliX
@alixsed
There is only this problem: people can put their money together but they cannot put their poor bandwidth together if the internet in their region is not good.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Law❦︎ pfp
Law❦︎
@traguy.eth
Hmmm How do you foresee scaling the bandwidth requirements without compromising network performance tho?
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Donh 🎩 Ⓜ️ pfp
Donh 🎩 Ⓜ️
@dih
this would be amazing, I like tiered down approach, 16 seems like a good number , eth is for everyone...
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Reeeny pfp
Reeeny
@reeeny
16 ETH is still out of reach for me, but two friends of mine would put our funds together to make this work.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

441小七 pfp
441小七
@441ewoyy
very good!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

YungSB.eth πŸ”΄βœ¨ pfp
YungSB.eth πŸ”΄βœ¨
@yungsb
Thank you, this is very much needed πŸ™πŸΎ
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction