Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Kyle McCollom
@kyle
As a user with a Farcaster account, I'd rather see someone's Farcaster username in your app than their ENS. I interact with people's Farcaster username, not their ENS. The namespace more closely associated with online identity and my social graph will win.
19 replies
9 recasts
65 reactions
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
I don't think we have to choose between the two paths? @dwr.eth isn't the plan already that farcaster names will become accessible as an ENS subdomain via CCIP, similar to how status works/worked with *.stateofus.eth? We're going to get namespace competition via L2s anyway, ENS just makes it interoperable.
3 replies
1 recast
21 reactions
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
The vitalik vs vitalik.eth thing is interesting, but it's also not a namespace issue: there's the possibility of eg. some unscrupulous L2 getting `optimism` on FC. The natural solution is for frontends like Warpcast to censor or put a big warning on impersonating accounts.
1 reply
0 recast
6 reactions
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
Ideally we've have community-managed lists for that sort of thing, similar to the list metamask maintains form scams. No need for fancy governance: if a list itself becomes abusive (eg. someone's legit account gets declared a scammer because the list admins don't like their politics), the community can just fork.
2 replies
0 recast
12 reactions