Vitalik Buterin pfp
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
In multiple European cities now I see taxis being allowed to use the bus lane (while of course regular cars are not). What's the policy justification for this?
112 replies
330 recasts
1681 reactions

polar pfp
polar
@polar
Because they are seen as public transport. Technically they are only supposed to do so when working. Personally I prefer to have them in the taxi lanes as they are among the least predictable drivers.
3 replies
3 recasts
30 reactions

Vitalik Buterin pfp
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
But taxis don't have any of the key properties of public transport that usually motivate actively subsidizing its adoption? * environmental friendliness * low contribution to congestion * high-fixed-cost cost curve "You're annoying so you get to use the fast lane" feels like good short-term move but bad long-term :D
3 replies
2 recasts
17 reactions

polar pfp
polar
@polar
This just came to mind, but they are a form of public transport commonly used by people who can't drive and might not be able to use buses, e.g. the elderly, the sick, the young.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Thumbs Up pfp
Thumbs Up
@thumbsup.eth
Agreed. They should be in some sort of carpool lane maybe but that lane should not be the same as a true high occupants vehicle like a shuttle or bus.
1 reply
1 recast
1 reaction

Luke Puplett pfp
Luke Puplett
@lukep
I guess the thought is that taxis are circulatory transport so for people who have not introduced an additional personal car to the system. I don't have all the information to know if it's a good idea or whether incentivising mass transit should be the goal.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction