Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
Remember "proof of location", and fancy schemes we crypto people would come up with that were based on network delay / speed of light calculations? Turns out people are looking into using that stuff.... for export control of AI chips https://www.iaps.ai/research/location-verification-for-ai-chips
6 replies
10 recasts
253 reactions
mike perhats
@perhats
Timely https://x.com/witnesschain/status/1820840606173925759?s=46
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
π _π£π _π
@m-j-r
then we get into RFML cat-and-mouse. two asset-based techniques that most certainly can be disabled/disrupted from the board, and one w/ attritable precision.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Alina π© π£ π :β’>
@alinaya
π Your cast cashed in! Claim π© DEGEN tokens on jam now! π£ https://jam.so/?referrer=zOU1F4 π£
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Steve
@stevehere.eth
This is nothing but a roundabout way to enforce "you will own nothing and be happy". If the hardware depends on being able to phone home to function, you don't own it - The company does. Ideas like these should be nuked out of existence.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Yoda Sant
@yodasant
I believe that the best solution to protect the integrity and confidentiality of the network would be to develop a new language without backdoor, allowing us to create new encryption algorithms to safeguard against future implementations.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
tradehigher.base
@yeoraemyson
Do blockchain need an AI chip tho?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction