Vinay Vasanji pfp
Vinay Vasanji
@vinayvasanji.eth
For a long time I believed we would live in a world where everyone would have multiple addresses—in a similar way that we have hundreds of accounts for web services But for a while now I've been convinced that the actual address part will be as visible to end users as IP addresses are, that is, basically invisible and abstracted away FC primary addresses is a prime example of that—most people will only interact and transact with my fname, they won't need to really know my address The same will be true of other crypto apps—we're in a brief period of fragmentation and complexity around wallet addresses, but not too long from now most of us will never need to see them or track them
3 replies
1 recast
3 reactions

polymutex pfp
polymutex
@polymutex.eth
Blockchains can't get mass adoption without privacy, and privacy requires abstracting the notion of an account away from public identifiers like addresses.
2 replies
1 recast
8 reactions

Garrett pfp
Garrett
@garrett
Do you imagine a public address that then has logic/rules that control sub accounts? Or do you envision a public wallet address more akin to a mail box or email address that’s easily findable and accessible?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Tudor 🟣🟡 pfp
Tudor 🟣🟡
@tudorizer
sure but if that’s the case, why bother with all this cryptography on blockchains? better use PayPal and whetever social network is the most popular by actual active users, ideally with >1k DAUs
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction