Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Venkatesh Rao ☀️ pfp
Venkatesh Rao ☀️
@vgr
Crypto-positivity is countercyclic to nationalism in a different way than cosmopolitan globalism Cosmopolitanism= nations winning peacefully, at-peace world win-winning. Positive-sum Nationalism: zero-sum tense competition among nations over resources Crypto-future: X% of nations in conflict-failure. Negative-sum
2 replies
5 recasts
29 reactions
Venkatesh Rao ☀️ pfp
Venkatesh Rao ☀️
@vgr
In old, pre-industrial mercantilism, land was thought to be the base scarce resource and nationalism was the default. In neo-nationalism it’s a changing basket of things like 3nm fab capacity, cobalt reserves, oil/gas etc. Neo-mercantilism. It’s economic bs but it rules politics nevertheless.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Venkatesh Rao ☀️ pfp
Venkatesh Rao ☀️
@vgr
There are also non-consensus elements like carbon and pollution budget. And fundamentally religious scarcities like contested sacred territories (Al Aqsa/Temple Mount, Ayodhya…) When nations act neo-mercantilist in a world that still has unevenly distributed non-zero-sum schumpeterian dynamics you get Weirding
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Venkatesh Rao ☀️ pfp
Venkatesh Rao ☀️
@vgr
While there are cases for crypto in cosmopolitan and nationalist worlds, they rest on much more enabling tech that doesn’t yet exist (eg metaverse) OR utopianism (“crypto carbon credits save the works!”) As of now de facto future that crypto is a hedge for is a conflict-ridden weird world. An insurance policy.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Venkatesh Rao ☀️ pfp
Venkatesh Rao ☀️
@vgr
Whether the world is net positive-sum, negative-sum or approximately zero-sum is strongly a function of what people believe it is. It’s not as much a function of innovation as we might hope. Innovation has highly leveraged positive-sum influence on the function but is not a monocausal determinant of outcomes
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Venkatesh Rao ☀️ pfp
Venkatesh Rao ☀️
@vgr
Ironically tech optimism is a kind of world pessimism. If you’re pinning all your hopes on innovation removing all scarcities and restoring win-win cosmopolitanism among nations in a peaceful world you’re deeply pessimistic about every *other* source of optimism like belief in human empathy, compassion etc.
1 reply
1 recast
3 reactions
Venkatesh Rao ☀️ pfp
Venkatesh Rao ☀️
@vgr
Pragmatically I think we’ll continue in a world that’s basically 70% irrational nationalism (zero-sum resource wars, ethnic cleansing, fights over holy lands, carbon defection), 25% neo-Marxist delusions, 4% wishful hopeless compassionate mutualism, 1% nonzero-sum leveraged innovation racing against the 99%
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Venkatesh Rao ☀️ pfp
Venkatesh Rao ☀️
@vgr
This nets out to a permaweird world for the foreseeable future or at least the rest of my expected lifetime. That’s why I call it the permaweird. I don’t expect macro to shift to another regime in my lifetime In this world crypto’s raison d’etre is creating an economic value ground in an asylum run by inmates
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Venkatesh Rao ☀️ pfp
Venkatesh Rao ☀️
@vgr
I think the Bitcoin maxis have oversimplified this (basically correct imo) intuition into a “waiting for mad max world” hurry-up-and-collapse bet where they hope for a condition of “ancap rationality.” Like larp-preppers They’re wrong. The world can remain weird longer than you can remain ancap.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction