Venkatesh Rao ☀️
@vgr
Web3 composability mavens need to study and learn from the precedent of kit culture. We need Web3 kit culture. Need FC kit. https://makezine.com/article/technology/kits-and-revolutions/
6 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
🪷
@pdr
Hardware wallets and perhaps Raspberry Pi come to mind as components for web3 kit. What else are you imagining?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Tony D’Addeo
@deodad
FC base kits: secure auth feed + discover + profile UI components feed + recommend + trending algorithm (reduce fns on sets of casts) blocklists FC app kit: no-code tool to "build" a client by composing together kits
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Chu Ka-Cheong
@kc
I think many get the analogy wrong. The point isn’t making the tech really easy to use. It is about opening to amateur innovation. It doesn’t have to be easy for the mass. But it has to be fun for people who are not financially motivated to play with it. Indeed I think web3 is failing by this metric.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
rafa (Devcon)
@rafa
Immediate reaction was: this is the reason I don’t use lens, too many parts, no kits web3 as a hobby with financial sustainability / ownership
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Cassie Heart
@cassie
I wrote an analogy on hobbyist computers to crypto a while back, you may find it interesting: farcaster://casts/0xb44fdc8f8db68a8c83aaf5d5339400ce856f29e71df516dbef696ec7b50c140c/0xb44fdc8f8db68a8c83aaf5d5339400ce856f29e71df516dbef696ec7b50c140c
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
andrewlb
@alb
This article is great, though I have some feels about (tool-based) kits. The good kit is the kit that immolates itself to create knowledge and experience, but sooo many kits don't do that. They are mostly parasitic to a beginner's ambition and curiosity. Wrote a bit on it here: https://andrewlb.com/avoiding-kits
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
