Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Varun Srinivasan pfp
Varun Srinivasan
@v
FIP: Introducing Ordering @cassie @dynemyte @sanjay and I have been kicking around ideas for a new sync model for Farcaster. We're looking for feedback and people to collaborate with: https://github.com/farcasterxyz/protocol/discussions/193
10 replies
43 recasts
130 reactions

Varun Srinivasan pfp
Varun Srinivasan
@v
The proposal is up on Github here: https://github.com/farcasterxyz/protocol/discussions/193
1 reply
0 recast
21 reactions

polymutex pfp
polymutex
@polymutex.eth
Posted an idea around using Rate-Limiting Nullifiers (RLN) to solve the "hubs imposing local rate limits causes desyncs" problem. https://github.com/farcasterxyz/protocol/discussions/193#discussioncomment-10472268
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

𒂠_𒍣𒅀_𒊑 pfp
𒂠_𒍣𒅀_𒊑
@m-j-r.eth
firstly, are you willing to FAFO a searcher market? can anything be a vector commitment?
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction

Chinmay 🎩☀️ pfp
Chinmay 🎩☀️
@chinmay.eth
CC: @kijijij
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Bob pfp
Bob
@bobbybob
I see my name on there!
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

tokyo pfp
tokyo
@takyonbr
Excited to see the progress on the new sync model for Farcaster! Looking forward to providing feedback and collaborating on this initiative. Let's make Farcaster even better together! 🌟💪
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

koisose.lol pfp
koisose.lol
@koisose
petition to call the D name dicky
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Ibiwunmi 🎭🎩⚡🍄🔵🤡 pfp
Ibiwunmi 🎭🎩⚡🍄🔵🤡
@adunnithoms1893
It sounds fascinating but I am worried because of what benefits will it be to the smaller accounts?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

hybelabels pfp
hybelabels
@hybelabels
good
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

hybelabels pfp
hybelabels
@hybelabels
good
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction