Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Varun Srinivasan pfp
Varun Srinivasan
@v
Popular channels get a lot of spam and manual moderation is hard to scale and decentralize. Proposal: - Hosts can turn on a fee in settings - Users must pay 100 warps before they can post - If banned, user must pay the fee again before posting - Fees go to hosts If you are a channel lead, would you use this?
118 replies
38 recasts
350 reactions
MetaEnd.degen โ€” ๐ŸŽฉ๐Ÿค–/dau pfp
MetaEnd.degen โ€” ๐ŸŽฉ๐Ÿค–/dau
@metaend.eth
Let them token gate with any. Warps are centralized and cannot be a long term solution imo
1 reply
1 recast
12 reactions
sntlss pfp
sntlss
@saintless.eth
maybe have it optional? up to hosts decisions I think it def makes sense for huge channels and doesn't for small/growing ones.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Jonny Mack pfp
Jonny Mack
@nonlinear.eth
yes
0 reply
0 recast
6 reactions
Max Jackson pfp
Max Jackson
@mxjxn.eth
I honestly cant foresee this strategy improving quality at all for /cryptoart.
3 replies
0 recast
5 reactions
dawufi pfp
dawufi
@dawufi
i dont get spam but it's a cool idea actually i might use it just for fun to see how much value im providing in the channel and get real user feedback bonus feature where you can send fees to a target address like purple treasury would be sick. or maybe @nonlinear.eth could hook it up to a @fabric hypersub somehow
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Michail / Opium Hum / Hyper Real pfp
Michail / Opium Hum / Hyper Real
@opiumhum
From my POV definitely not - most channels rely on users bringing their know-how to the community, making them pay for this feels off to me, esp. if the fee would go to the host (even though that would make sense in some other context).
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
elle pfp
elle
@riotgoools
i haven't encountered much spam in /vip bc it's a small/medium sized niche channel where everyone is well behaved ^-^ the current tool set is working for me so i wouldn't turn this on could be interesting an experiment for high spam channels ยฏ\_(ใƒ„)_/ยฏ tho i would worry the spam would just migrate to other places
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Jason Goldberg ๐Ÿณ๏ธโ€๐ŸŒˆ pfp
Jason Goldberg ๐Ÿณ๏ธโ€๐ŸŒˆ
@betashop.eth
it's an interesting option! but maybe also give channel hosts some additional options if they don't want all/nothing on it being fee-gated? e.g. maybe allow-list gated with various FC/onchain criteria as options?
2 replies
1 recast
22 reactions
Jason Goldberg ๐Ÿณ๏ธโ€๐ŸŒˆ pfp
Jason Goldberg ๐Ÿณ๏ธโ€๐ŸŒˆ
@betashop.eth
another option also could be to have users "stake" the warps rather than pay them if they are good actors for say 30 days they get it back
7 replies
0 recast
19 reactions
Jesse Pollak ๐Ÿ”ต pfp
Jesse Pollak ๐Ÿ”ต
@jessepollak
seems like an interesting experiment - definitely could imagine it working! cc @wbnns
1 reply
0 recast
8 reactions
borodutch @ lunchbreak.com pfp
borodutch @ lunchbreak.com
@farcasteradmin.eth
make it a 1000 and i'm in
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
David Furlong pfp
David Furlong
@df
not sure if Id use it. depends how much it would hurt channel growth. I think itd hurt it a lot and not be worth it
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Daniel Fernandes pfp
Daniel Fernandes
@dfern.eth
I love it, reminds me of Rate Limiting Nullifiers
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
daivd ๐ŸŽฉ๐Ÿ‘ฝ pfp
daivd ๐ŸŽฉ๐Ÿ‘ฝ
@qt
Absolutely
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Ridgely pfp
Ridgely
@ridgely
Why not stake instead of pay? Then you can use normal burning mechanisms.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
six pfp
six
@six
Not for /six because we don't get much spam but I am supportive in general, would be good for larger channels
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
shazow pfp
shazow
@shazow.eth
Yes. In addition to: Make user agree to norms before posting the first time.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
llamafacts pfp
llamafacts
@llamafacts.eth
Consider these to prevent impacting engagement 1. What about not force users to pay upfront but rather make them pay only if they break. 2. There could be a setting that prevents newly created users from casting more than X times depending on the time they've existed in FC that way we prevent bots.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
venet pfp
venet
@lk
Would definitely help cut down on the spam I have seen in /frames since our content moderation tirade began. But gating posting in channels directly disincentivizes discovery. Perhaps there's a medium - charge warps to get back in once banned; cost to get back in scales up by 50 for each ban on the same user?
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction