Varun Srinivasan on Warpcast

Varun Srinivasan pfp

Varun Srinivasan

FIP: Extend Storage Expiry - Give all existing storage units an extra free year to avoid user churn and unnecessary work for clients - Reduce the size of new storage units issued. Lets us bring down the cost of registration in the future. https://github.com/farcasterxyz/protocol/discussions/191

23 replies

7 recasts

176 reactions

Varun Srinivasan pfp

Varun Srinivasan

We're looking for feedback on this, either in this thread or on Github. We'll be discussing this at the next protocol meeting on Aug 15 before we make a final decision. This change should be net positive for users and developers.

3 replies

0 recast

12 reactions

Cameron Armstrong pfp

Cameron Armstrong

makes sense to me - although it probably makes more sense to separate the 2 concepts into separate discussions?

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Jacque(she|her).⌐◨-◨ pfp

Jacque(she|her).⌐◨-◨

So all our storage is extended a year from when it was purchased? I know so many folx that have bought a ton. I’m on my third myself Any way to delete chosen ones from FARCASTER completely? For posterity reasons I want my first post to stay and since it is the oldest it will get overwritten. I learned as well that if you delete a cast in WARPCAST it still exists on other clients which was a shocker.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Matthew pfp

how do you define "existing"? all users who have taken an action on the protocol? or smth else? I guess I'd wonder, re the "payment for storage defends against spam" argument, would it be better to let "spammer" accounts' storage expire and force them to pay.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

nyc-crypto-cabal-kid pfp

nyc-crypto-cabal-kid

So with this change my existing storage units will be extended for a year but they'll also be roughly half the size so that means I need to pay for ~double the storage units right now if I want to keep all of my data?

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

woj pfp

+1 is vote otherwise if protocol was more mature, and fees were used for anything meaningful rn happy to just push the problem away

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

David Furlong pfp

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Max Jackson pfp

Related note, I would really love to pay multiple years at once, or schedule yearly payments like a subscription. The storage details are a bit buried for the average user.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

tricil pfp

lol I just bought two units yesterday oh, well I’m not going anywhere!

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Kieran Daniels 🎩 pfp

Kieran Daniels 🎩

I know this is a way bigger convo than a random comment and you guys are already thinking about this probably, but the UX of buying storage and tracking usage is brutal. My unsolicited opinion: to subscription / recurring revenue model way sooner than later. It’s $5 a month to use Warpcast. $5 to signup and create your account and then you get a list of features, an immutable social identity, and x amount of initial storage. I don’t know how the math works but if your auto charging $5 monthly then I feel like that rev would possibly outweigh the storage costs and then be EV+? You can also just background charge this using Apple Pay, like how the Titan investment app works. Another model you could steal from them is refer 3 friends that signup = get 1 month free storage.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

elboletaire 🗳️ pfp

elboletaire 🗳️

@elboletaire.eth

Are you also considering rebalancing the storage units? I mean, giving a bit more space for reactions than for casts. Since casts may actually occupy more space than reactions, I don't see why we should have half the reactions compared to casts.

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

❓Mantine❓ pfp

As a 20 unit storage owner I appreciate this a lot

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Kyle Patrick pfp

@kylepatrick.eth

Will there be a similar FIP for channels?

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Jasmina pfp

Interesting take.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

borged.eth pfp

Yes, love to see the registration cost go down! Also how about having one single limit for all content types combined (follow, cast, reaction, etc.), and leave it to the client to prioritize one over another if necessary? The reaction limit creates mental burden for me at the moment.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Refan pfp

does this apply to onchain purchases as well via https://caststorage.com/ ?

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

SVVVG3 pfp

I support this 100% ✊

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

joshisdead.eth pfp

@joshisdead.eth

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Itsai ⌐◨-◨ pfp

Itsai ⌐◨-◨

I’ve got a failed buy on a extra unit but eventually it charged me but isn’t on my profile. Is there somewhere we can open a ticket or something?

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction