Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
21 recasts
21 reactions

Varun Srinivasan pfp
Varun Srinivasan
@v
The Frame Transactions spec is ready for feedback! Please share your thoughts in replies, comments or DMs. Your feedback is very important to help us get the design right. https://www.notion.so/warpcast/Frames-Transactions-Public-Draft-c2e0d3210d684b4cb7803de1810db36d?pm=c
52 replies
110 recasts
504 reactions

Varun Srinivasan pfp
Varun Srinivasan
@v
Our goal is to collect feedback over the next 24-48 hours and then finalize a spec before the developer call on Thursday. h/t @horsefacts.eth for the heavy lifting and @deodad @gt and @sanjay for design input.
0 reply
2 recasts
36 reactions

Cameron Armstrong pfp
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
actually quick question - before going live can y'all make a hidden/dev page in the warpcast mobile app that acts as a playground for testing transactions/how things appear/etc Feels more important now that the stakes are higher than just raw frames
2 replies
0 recast
26 reactions

six pfp
six
@six
So on mobile, users need to have the Coinbase Wallet app for it to work?
2 replies
0 recast
4 reactions

Shun Kakinoki pfp
Shun Kakinoki
@shunkakinoki
Do you guys have plans to support for ‘eth_sign’ for wallets doing account abstraction?
1 reply
1 recast
6 reactions

Nico.cast🎩  pfp
Nico.cast🎩
@n
Thanks @v for another comprehensive doc! Can Warpcast/Farcaster protocol maintains a list of “trusted” e.g whitelisted domains publicly, in GitHub? This is more decentralized and 1. helps all devs implementing frames decide which sites to allow 2. allow pull requests for new apps to be added to the list
1 reply
0 recast
7 reactions

ivan pfp
ivan
@hot
using fctransaction:// scheme would make it possible for wallets to support it with no external dependencies universal links can be specified in farcaster client to use a specific wallet when several wallet apps are installed using fctransaction:// scheme will make it possible to sign on desktop with no walletconnect
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions

Henri Stern Ꙫ pfp
Henri Stern Ꙫ
@henri
Your excalidraw game is on another level @v !
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

jacopo pfp
jacopo
@jacopo.eth
since trusted domains can unknowingly allow malicious transactions, doesn’t it defeat the purpose of maintaining a list?
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Stephan pfp
Stephan
@stephancill
my hot take is that transaction urls should not be in the spec. adds a lot of complexity to what should be relatively straightforward tool for frames to use and is a centralizing force only domain attribution and who shared the frame should be presented to the user in client - no tx simulation, wallets already to this
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

jon wong pfp
jon wong
@jnwng
in case it is useful, this concept has been battle-tested on Solana—check out [Solana Pay transaction requests](https://docs.solanapay.com/core/transaction-request/overview) in case that provides any useful insight. similar strategy to encode the URL, although given Solana's account model has different params
2 replies
1 recast
7 reactions

Henri Stern Ꙫ pfp
Henri Stern Ꙫ
@henri
Left some notes around transaction format and CAIP 10 as well as how to set up UI standards that can work across FC clients so detecting malicious frames becomes easier for users. In general would be very useful to have a Frames reporting site to quickly flag malicious ones
0 reply
0 recast
7 reactions

7858 pfp
7858
@7858.eth
POV: You're having drinks with the homies at /ethdenver and someone mentions that the Frame Transaction spec just dropped
0 reply
0 recast
6 reactions

JB Rubinovitz ⌐◨-◨ pfp
JB Rubinovitz ⌐◨-◨
@rubinovitz
We should have an redteam contest for this on Farcaster
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions

Michael Silberling pfp
Michael Silberling
@msilb7
Made some comments in the attribution section. cc /data nerds @ilemi @juicemanjames.eth @chuxin
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions

Volqa Inc pfp
Volqa Inc
@volqa
Read on mobile, had trouble commenting. Great work, some feedback: - Consider adding optional authorized_hosts to transaction JSON; limit Frame URLs that can request - Could you support follow-up handlers to "reverts" from transaction, something akin to ERC-3668
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Mark Carey 🎩🫂 pfp
Mark Carey 🎩🫂
@markcarey
Will the call from client to transaction intent URL be a GET or POST? Seems like a post makes most sense, including a similar payload to "post" actions.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Mark Carey 🎩🫂 pfp
Mark Carey 🎩🫂
@markcarey
In terms of the Warpcast allowlist, something to consider is "posting a bond" or paying in Warps for consideration, much in the same way that you have to pay 100 Warps to post in the /frames channel -- this may reduce the human vetting required by reducing applicants to serious ones.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Salvino Armati ↑ pfp
Salvino Armati ↑
@salvino
built different
0 reply
1 recast
20 reactions

Linda Xie pfp
Linda Xie
@linda
@pirosb3 get in there :D
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions