Varun Srinivasan pfp
Varun Srinivasan
@v
Wrote up some thoughts on evolving Farcaster into a protocol for all social networks, and not just twitter-like ones Feedback welcome! https://hackmd.io/@farcasterxyz/Hyyt7NFb2
21 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Varun Srinivasan pfp
Varun Srinivasan
@v
cc @blobs and @rckprtr
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jason Goldberg pfp
Jason Goldberg
@betashop.eth
love the thoughts @v one observation: we're still framing web3 social technologies on web2 primitives (e.g. web3 twitter, facebook, whatsapp, snapchat), kinda like horseless wagons, flying cars -- looking forward to defining new primitives as well!
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
df pfp
df
@df
🥝 Inspiring post! Curious what you had in mind with parallel namespaces
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Brian Li 🍊👾 pfp
Brian Li 🍊👾
@bli.eth
Huge fan of the idea of private casts! Imo closed social networks will be equally as important as open ones
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Connor McCormick ☀️ pfp
Connor McCormick ☀️
@nor
wow this would be amazing
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Daniel Lombraña pfp
Daniel Lombraña
@teleyinex.eth
Really nice article. While reading it I got some similarities with lens and how you can create smart contracts attached to your identity. That modularity is really nice. On the other hand, they don't have separated graphs.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Giuliano Giacaglia 🌲 pfp
Giuliano Giacaglia 🌲
@giu
Awesome!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Liang @ degencast.wtf 🎩 pfp
Liang @ degencast.wtf 🎩
@degencast.eth
the difference between fc and ceramic is getting narrow🌝🌝
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
ghost pfp
ghost
@molo
Really into message tagging: I think it can drift between flexible schemas and context separation. Tags for messages can allow clients to not just understand content context but also client context itself: makes filtering way simpler and imo makes the possibility for client-based communities much stronger
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
boscolo.eth pfp
boscolo.eth
@boscolo.eth
This is awesome! I for one wanted to start building on Private casting months ago!!!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Karthik Senthil pfp
Karthik Senthil
@karthiksenthil
Really enjoyed this
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
BKim pfp
BKim
@brittkim.eth
🥝
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Sriram Krishnan pfp
Sriram Krishnan
@sriramk.eth
would be good to work through what a non text based network may look like (say...TikTok?)
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jithin Raj pfp
Jithin Raj
@jithinraj
Thank you, been wondering about the FC plans for the points mentioned. The main takeaway being decentralized social platforms are way more complicated and still so much in making. We have solved identity and text storage but will take some time to evolve up to the current level of Web2 ‘social’ & ‘media’.🚀
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Michael Pfister pfp
Michael Pfister
@pfista
"Could Farcaster become a 'Turing-complete' protocol allowing different social networks to be built?" 1000% Yes
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Landon pfp
Landon
@lndnnft
"But significant strides can be made by focussing on the low-hanging kiwis first" love it
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Chris pfp
Chris
@piffie
We’ll thought through. We are building a protocol and some parts of it require exclusive content. So that would come in handy. Do you think such features would be doable with zk-roll ups?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
oi pfp
oi
@oi
Nice read
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
cj pfp
cj
@cj
Oh shit yes
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction