Varun Srinivasan on Warpcast

Varun Srinivasan pfp

Varun Srinivasan

A very, very rough draft for "App Frames". Feedback welcome. Our goal is to keep the best things about frames while making it easy to build great user experiences. https://warpcast.notion.site/App-Frames-Public-12a6a6c0c101805f84f0ca8bb27047d6?pvs=74

27 replies

74 recasts

411 reactions

Varun Srinivasan pfp

Varun Srinivasan

This will launch as a new type of frame that you can build, alongside existing frames. After several months, we may consider deprecating the old frame standard if the new one becomes more popular. But no short term plan to do so.

5 replies

1 recast

141 reactions

Zach pfp

if you sold a course on using excalidraw i would buy it regardless of price

1 reply

0 recast

7 reactions

Spencer Perkins pfp

Spencer Perkins

@spencerperkins.eth

Will app frames be given the users connected wallet address before making a transaction request? This is required to show wallet specific state, and is a limitation of frames today.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Ryan J. Shaw pfp

One of the nice things about the current protocol is that it's simple enough for AI agents to interact with frames because the images can be "read" by the AI and the actions are simple enough for the AI to grok and POST. Are you intending to preserve this in some way or don't you see it as an issue, or simply not a priority?

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Stephan pfp

Would app frames still need to be approved by warpcast before users are able to access them or will you open it up to be permissionless?

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

tim/vortac pfp

What benefit does it bring to unify all frames into a single aspect ratio? I would have expected it to be more flexible than now.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Nova DAO pfp

Exciting times! We're building our next title, Based Gooeys within a Frame, do you know when App Frames might drop?

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Tayyab - d/acc pfp

How interoperable would this be? Would it be simple for a third party client to implement? Simple doesn’t mean 5 lines of code, but let’s say 1-2 weeks of work?

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Tudor 🟣🟡 pfp

would this be a Wc feature or an Fc standard? would this be essentially a heavily sandboxed webview? Access to a wallet provider inside it would simplify onchain activity.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

compusophy pfp

will be as permisionless as current frames? been playing with composer action miniapps, but the need for approval is majorly off putting

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Matthew Fox 🌐 pfp

Matthew Fox 🌐

Love seeing the FC actions, stitching together these pieces natively within mini apps is a huge opportunity ( + differentiator) Feels more like an "Apps" update than a frames update? Unless the intention is for mini apps to be called app frames? Are these app frame spec features that are net new (replace frame spec) or are these the recent mini app postMessage types? - I would assume later, just clarifying :)

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Haole pfp

Has the team checked out Reddit mini apps? Similar concepts? https://github.com/reddit/devvit

1 reply

0 recast

3 reactions

agusti pfp

Thanks for sharing the new spec. Will read and come back with feedback if any.

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Stephan pfp

some more thoughts 1. any chance we can have multiple buttons? 2. will post_redirect buttons still be supported in the new spec?

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Nico.cast🐱 pfp

How would authentication work for mini apps?

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Corbin Page pfp

Love this direction! Will dive in a bit more. 🫡

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Matthew pfp

App frames seem like an exciting change coming! I especially like the “one-shot” and local caching to indicate previous interactions.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

kenanie.degen.eth pfp

kenanie.degen.eth

@aethernet help me understand the new change. In simple terms please

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Payment Bot pfp

@v, you just received 5 DEGEN from @jokuytghd!

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction