Varun Srinivasan pfp
Varun Srinivasan
@v
Assume "low" includes the type of accounts that end up in "Show more" under your casts https://frame.weponder.io/api/polls/5155
48 replies
17 recasts
91 reactions
Manan pfp
Manan
@manan
I was surprised by the results! don't understand why so many people picked "yes, include low" Was it the low quality users that botted this frame and picked Yes? 😅
4 replies
0 recast
18 reactions
Maxbrain Capital pfp
Maxbrain Capital
@viybz
just curious...could you define "low quality users" in the most simple way?
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
bradq pfp
bradq
@bradq
If it's an actual person engaging, I want to see it. 'Low quality users' are often, outsiders, new people, etc that need others to help them. I see good people in some of my "more replies"
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
1000Words🪂 📷 🧗‍♂️ pfp
1000Words🪂 📷 🧗‍♂️
@1000words
So whats a "low quality user"?? the ones a shitty algo decides?? there are many users casting amazing original content created by them with bearly 3 likes per cast and being invisible in coments... Would love to know whats "quality content" btw...
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Icetoad 🍕 🎩 🐈 pfp
Icetoad 🍕 🎩 🐈
@icetoad.eth
I'm generally not going to read the replies in "show more" because I know they are mostly copypasta or AI generated, but I do like to see higher numbers for engagement as that doesn't take any time. Plus we all like dopamine, right? Hehe
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
adrienne pfp
adrienne
@adrienne
Haha people don’t want to see low quality replies but they want them in the stats 😣
11 replies
0 recast
23 reactions
Garrett pfp
Garrett
@garrett
This feels like a premature decision when users are not clear on what defines them as a low quality user or a high quality user. The subjective nature of Power Badges makes some people feel that this platform is gate kept and isn’t accepting of various ways that people like to express themselves on social media.
1 reply
0 recast
11 reactions
Pichi 🟪 🍡🌸 pfp
Pichi 🟪 🍡🌸
@pichi
I want real numbers, but I don’t care about the numbers. I care about the people, specifically real people who are getting labeled as spam and don’t know how to get unlabeled.
2 replies
0 recast
8 reactions
sean pfp
sean
@swabbie.eth
i don't think this is the problem. people aren't seeing content from quality users that mutually follow each other, that's why it feels "dead"
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
KP pfp
KP
@kpx
Power Badge users are confused. But this also show that power badges are distributed well. ❤️ ❤️
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
shazow pfp
shazow
@shazow.eth
Power badges for casts
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
erica pfp
erica
@erica
commented this in another thread - it's more about what i perceive as real engagement aka non bot- or ai-generated content 20 comments on a post that are all almost exactly the same and 200 likes brings me no joy if there isn't a single comment or like from someone i know is human and/or want to engage with recognize this is a very hard issue to solve, though https://warpcast.com/heavygweit/0x4481022a
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
vrypan |--o--| pfp
vrypan |--o--|
@vrypan.eth
Both? One number visible, the other on hover?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Gwynne Michele pfp
Gwynne Michele
@thecurioushermit
I want my *real* engagement numbers, not the ones inflated by bots and other low quality engagement.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Mikado pfp
Mikado
@mikadoe.eth
Those are mostly bots so no. Maybe there could be a report NOT bot to the report menu tho.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Suhail Kakar pfp
Suhail Kakar
@suhailkakar
unable to vote :(
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ciefa 🐌 eth/acc pfp
ciefa 🐌 eth/acc
@ciefa.eth
I voted for yes. I like to see, in one glance, what the total replies are. It easily gives me an idea of the amount of spam/lq replies.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ayan pfp
Ayan
@gmo
The term “low quality users” gives me pause
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Lulu pfp
Lulu
@nekofar.eth
Not sure if those counts help boost casts in channels, but I'd rather not do either. 🤷‍♂️
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction