ucia
@ucia
6 replies
3 recasts
34 reactions
16 replies
22 recasts
108 reactions
0 reply
12 recasts
22 reactions
6 replies
34 recasts
119 reactions
3 replies
9 recasts
41 reactions
18 replies
14 recasts
85 reactions
39 replies
30 recasts
331 reactions
0 reply
9 recasts
6 reactions
8 replies
5 recasts
29 reactions
1 reply
3 recasts
10 reactions
10 replies
9 recasts
23 reactions
26 replies
12 recasts
23 reactions
I feel like this is the right channel to have this discussion.
@mazmhussain do you think we'll be able to find a solution to the "post-truth" situation we're in? I thought about it when I saw your cast about the meme with the UFOs, saying that ppl didn't even care when NSA confirmed UFOs are real, because they're bombarded with information.
I feel like the problem is not so much the "volume" than the "quality". We went from a state where "I saw it on TV= it's true" to "I don't trust anything I see/hear by default". Related to that, we seem to have internalized the fact that objectivity/neutrality doesn't exist, there's only partisan opinions. Even if there's some truth to it, I feel like it's a slippery slope, because it tends to put in the same bag journalists who, while having opinions, aim at neutrality, and journalist who don't care at all and go for full bias. It's a small nuance, but a very important one imo.
Happy to hear ppl's thoughts on this, and be pointed to thinkers who went over this matter. 4 replies
7 recasts
10 reactions
1 reply
5 recasts
25 reactions
7 replies
8 recasts
63 reactions
100 replies
37 recasts
192 reactions
1 reply
6 recasts
8 reactions
5 replies
6 recasts
41 reactions
40 replies
6 recasts
38 reactions
0 reply
4 recasts
5 reactions