Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

ണ Ի ന ℇ ന ℇ ട pfp
ണ Ի ന ℇ ന ℇ ട
@mrmemes.eth
wowow. IYKYK.
2 replies
1 recast
1 reaction

ണ Ի ന ℇ ന ℇ ട pfp
ണ Ի ന ℇ ന ℇ ട
@mrmemes.eth
Nice work @tynes, I've been watching this closely from the sidelines 🔴
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Mark Tyneway pfp
Mark Tyneway
@tynes
Do you have any plans to build with this feature? Would love to hear any feedback
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

ണ Ի ന ℇ ന ℇ ട pfp
ണ Ի ന ℇ ന ℇ ട
@mrmemes.eth
The biggest issue we've run into has been pure cognitive dissonance. I had a gaff where, because I'd "bridged in and ERC20", I made plans that expected to have access to `approve` semantics. My mental model didn't translate well there 😅, but reality snapped me into shape pretty quickly. That sort of thing.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

ണ Ի ന ℇ ന ℇ ട pfp
ണ Ի ന ℇ ന ℇ ട
@mrmemes.eth
Yep, we have a client that will be launching their testnet soon and it utilizes it. FWIW we replaced a bespoke implementation (based on op-specs #67) with this one, so nothing was terribly surprising to us. Your implementation is much more fully-integrated into the stack than ours was 🙃
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction