venturecapital

The really weird part about VC is that the feedback cycles are so long that people can build up reputation as being a popular or even good VC without actually having made any investments that return capital for the fund

Co-founder @bountycaster (bountycaster.xyz). Co-producer @ethereumfilm. Previously co-founder of Scalar Capital and product at Coinbase

So is that a good thing or a bad thing, Linda?

Host /health-hive
| /physicaltherapy | Anime | Fitness 

What i mean is

 I've seen it before where a VC can get a lot of attention and hype just because they're making a lot of deals, even if those deals aren't necessarily successful. 

Do you think this is a major contributor to the problem? 

And what can be done to change the way we evaluate VC performance and reputation?