Tom Conlan pfp

Tom Conlan

@tomconlan

112 Following
350 Followers


Tom Conlan pfp
Tom Conlan
@tomconlan
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHRiakgTjuk 🥶 🥶 🥶
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Tom Conlan pfp
Tom Conlan
@tomconlan
the smiths 🤌
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Tom Conlan pfp
Tom Conlan
@tomconlan
fascinating
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Tom Conlan pfp
Tom Conlan
@tomconlan
spotted a little cardiod in the wild at dinner on Friday night
0 reply
0 recast
5 reactions

Tom Conlan pfp
Tom Conlan
@tomconlan
I'm the same, as long as it's healthy.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Tom Conlan pfp
Tom Conlan
@tomconlan
it's the same for me!
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Tom Conlan pfp
Tom Conlan
@tomconlan
@woj have you heard of the indexing project The Graph? And if so, why don't they solve your problem?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Tom Conlan pfp
Tom Conlan
@tomconlan
go to a book store with algebra books. Look at the early pages of the book, make sure you understand it, then look at the late pages, make sure you don't understand it. Then work through the book, and don't skip! Simplify the procedure and put all your energy into solving problems.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Tom Conlan pfp
Tom Conlan
@tomconlan
With the right large algorithm the entire works of Shakespeare can be extracted from any random data. With the right small algorithm, e.g. understanding English, the entire works of Shakespeare can be extracted from the entire works of Shakespeare. In each case the entropy of the system is the same. Either you need an algorithm that can extract the works of Shakespeare from randomness, in which case the algorithm will have entropy equal to the works of Shakespeare itself, or the algorithm will be small (understand English) and the data will be patterned (Shakespeare). So entropy(massive_algorithm(randomness)) = entropy(understand_english(works_of_shakespeare)) This is why the factoid that the entire works of Shakespeare can be found within the digits of pi is not as awesome as it initially seems. This is true for literally any data set in the universe, given the right algorithm. Either the information is in the data set and the algorithm is small, or the information is stored in the algorithm.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Tom Conlan pfp
Tom Conlan
@tomconlan
early-stage futarchy is going to be brutal @polymarket
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Tom Conlan pfp
Tom Conlan
@tomconlan
to me that felt like the easiest political bet I've been exposed to @polymarket, it was also my first time betting on politics. Time to get overconfident and lose it all!
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Tom Conlan pfp
Tom Conlan
@tomconlan
hahahah
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Tom Conlan pfp
Tom Conlan
@tomconlan
simply insane. what a time to be alive
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Tom Conlan pfp
Tom Conlan
@tomconlan
my prediction is that humanoid robots are still 20 years off
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Tom Conlan pfp
Tom Conlan
@tomconlan
what are you working on?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Tom Conlan pfp
Tom Conlan
@tomconlan
Magma’s are the Eevee of algebraic structures. A magma consists of a set equipped with a single binary operation that must be closed by definition. No other properties are imposed. It’s common to find these various algebraic Pokémon in your travels. I like to think of them as evolved Magma’s. If you give your magma an associativity stone it will turn into a semi-group, if you give it the identity stone too it will become a monoid!
2 replies
1 recast
5 reactions

Tom Conlan pfp
Tom Conlan
@tomconlan
Yes please sir
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Tom Conlan pfp
Tom Conlan
@tomconlan
Back from a month break, lets see if I can make this work haha
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Tom Conlan pfp
Tom Conlan
@tomconlan
It is addiction
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Tom Conlan pfp
Tom Conlan
@tomconlan
It’s probably just addiction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction