i remember when people were posting their uber scores in here some time back and i was shocked at how low the majority were but then i see how 'founder' types lose their shit when something as small as channel changes happen and i'm like ahhh yes, of course.

icebreaker.xyz/0xen |
https://gallery.so/Oxen/galleries | https://opensea.io/collection/farcats

Curious at what point do Uber rider scores become bad iyo

building /bracket | hosting /greatbooks + /gray | ex-BCG, ex-PHD | poli + phil + econ

ratings are fascinatingly accurate. any driver ive had under 4.80 has had some kind of significant issue. under 4.70 literally felt semi-dangerous the few times I tried, I wont even do it anymore.

I wouldnt be surprised if it worked the same for riders.

my score went from 4.90 to 4.80 over the last years, and the only thing that changed is I started selecting the option "Quiet" when it asked me what I "preferred conversation" option before booking. I could see that it might rub some drivers the wrong way, but I really do appreciate being able to be in my own space while traveling.

can’t remember exactly but there were some low low scores. probably some people had them for a long time, since wild college days so that plays a part. 

anecdotally, some of the most cringe dining experiences I’ve had were with wealthy coastal folks who just had no patience or grace. 

a lot of folks in the finance/founder space skipped any kind of service industry experience between college and a career and have a blind spot when it comes being polite. many exceptions of course.