@base contributor #001; onchain cities w/ OAK & city3

Hello @jessepollak and Faryar Shirzad https://i.imgur.com/6VTBgzJ.jpg

Hope this topic was on the docket: 

Rebrand “web3” —> “onchain”

Building /bracket 🏀🏒 | Ex-BCG, ex-PHD | Poli Sci + Econ + Philosophy | Hosting /gray + /nfl + /dont-do-this + /book-clubs

Building poolfish.xyz (/poolfish). A calculator for LP providers. Cooking /hotpotato. Built Potion solo to $6k+ MRR and sold for $300k.

1. Avg consumer doesnt know what "web2" is. That's an insider thing.

2. "onchain" is like the new "online" – it's a state with a value proposition.

3. I can see my 65 y/o dad saying "but is that onchain? and not "but is that web3?"

4. "chain" speaks to a fundamental technical property. "3" is wholly conventional.

Interesting proposal. What do you have against the name web3?