Content
@
https://ethereum.org
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Anyone have a more cryptonative overview of what this is referring to? https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-09-16/ethereum-s-eth-successful-overhaul-sends-developers-scrambling-for-another-fix
6 replies
0 recast
3 reactions
Kody
@kody.eth
Scrambling is harsh, but not too far off. The fact that this got approved for dencun within 10 days of its draft is unprecedented. We need this, but the speed at which it happened makes me a feel uneasy. https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-7514
3 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
@tim curious if you have thoughts?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
clash π π-'
@theclash
Also curious I (obviously) have thoughts, but still trying to find the keys to my old Bloomberg account βοΈ
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Nelson
@nelsonmckey
Seems the community was able to come to a very quick consensus. Is there anybody still arguing against it?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
clash π π-'
@theclash
I am arguing forever and always What consensus? Did we take an onchain vote? Did the clash win πͺ
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Nelson
@nelsonmckey
Hah. The only case against inclusion that Iβve seen is βitβs too last minute and might disrupt Dencun planningβ. Is anybody still in disagreement with the actual proposal? Any public concerns Iβve seen from a few weeks ago have been walked back. Seems like an important inclusion.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction