Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/okbanger
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
christin
@christin
yesterday @cameron and i debated about takes what happens after our show is i think about it more and end up disagreeing with what he said...and then we roll into the next show 🥴 i still think there is a human tendency to revere the perception of certainty; and while cameron says takes are transient, they are not *received* as transient and accumulate over time https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N2tQJNFQsig
5 replies
4 recasts
14 reactions
Daniel Lombraña
@teleyinex.eth
I just watched it today. When you were discussing people wanting to be led, I think what happens is a biological shortcut to avoid spending energy thinking. It is way easier to delegate that to others, so you don't have to think, and more importantly, if something doesn't go as expected, you have someone to blame that's not you. The other day, I posted a link to a paper showing how using AI reduces our critical thinking. Why are we using primarily AI? Because we are lazy. It is a shortcut, and in the long term, it hurts us badly.
3 replies
1 recast
2 reactions
Daniel Lombraña
@teleyinex.eth
I want to add another note. I disagree with @cameron regarding the people who don't want to be led, as he said that, in the end, they want to. I think most people in that group are not looking for leaders but for peers to get validation of their points of view. It is similar but different 😃
2 replies
1 recast
2 reactions
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
The disagreement can maybe partially be traced to a definitional issue (most people think of “leadership” as an authority figure making decisions) where i think of good leadership as more persuasive than imperative— but overall i still think people by default want to offload the responsibility of most things to somebody else (or as I would say “be led”)
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
christin
@christin
truly appreciate your nuanced insight and critical thinking!!
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
