Content pfp
Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/theai
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
few weeks old bill gates AI article is now trending on X, thanks to @unusualwhales. are you team A or team B? A) AI will help humans work more efficiently and spur economic growth that leads to more job creation, or B) AI will change with most jobs look like across nearly every industry and destabilize workforce
21 replies
5 recasts
35 reactions
osama pfp
osama
@osama
it's B but the workforce will find other work and worst case get some form of ubi/war. almost every expert agrees/knows. long term it's net positive, short term painful. like all previous technological leaps
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Steve pfp
Steve
@sdv.eth
B. Though most of my thoughts on this were reinforced from consuming ai-2027.com
1 reply
0 recast
6 reactions
kaito pfp
kaito
@kaito
porque no los dos I think same timeline different timeframe - jobs change, ppl not needed for todays jobs - then new jobs made , growth humans won’t be needed for a lot of things we do *today*
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
𒂭_𒂭 pfp
𒂭_𒂭
@m-j-r.eth
tbqh, I think Keynesian-style employment will become obsolete. but I also believe that we will learn to fill maslow's hierarchy while the markets retain premium. right now, many don't even bother with doctors and teachers, but they might consume more if their opiate of choice is an artificial companion that's both. construction & artisanal sectors are most lindy.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Evan pfp
Evan
@evangreenberg
I know AI might be different, but do these same articles exist from 20-30 years ago about the Internet? At some point, there is a human preference element in that humans may want to be taught by human teachers/seen by human doctors, even if the AI is cheaper or even better
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Michael Varde pfp
Michael Varde
@michaelvarde.eth
When AI replaces workers, it will be devastating. When AI replaces customers, it will be catastrophic.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Tony pfp
Tony
@0xt0ny
The AI brain may be getting smarter but I think we are more than 10 years away from the level of physical integration with our world required for wholesale change to most human work. We still suck at building physical automation at scale that doesn't need constant human intervention
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Mathieu pfp
Mathieu
@mathieuw
Sprinkles of both
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Catch0x22 (2025 variant) pfp
Catch0x22 (2025 variant)
@catch0x22.eth
both
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
stas pfp
stas
@stasmay.eth
Automation is real. Disruption might be bigger than we’ve ever seen and corporations gonna corporation bc the bottom line is profit.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Symbiotech pfp
Symbiotech
@symbiotech
B first then A
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Koolkheart pfp
Koolkheart
@koolkheart.eth
Team A feels like wishful thinking without policy innovation. Team B feels inevitable without societal innovation
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
alexander pfp
alexander
@the-cynic
leaning towards A but with eyes wide open. we just have to prioritize reskilling and equitable access.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jordan pfp
Jordan
@ruminations
B
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Shawki Sukkar pfp
Shawki Sukkar
@shawki
B, it should be shut down.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
shairaaa pfp
shairaaa
@shairaaa
B. I've seen a lot of virtual assistants and designers getting laid off because AI can now do their jobs as fast as the human can. But not clean and as accurate when a human does it. Employers look for a way to decrease their expenses and that's when they choose to use AI instead of hiring real talents.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Lost Midas pfp
Lost Midas
@lostmidas
Optimistically A, pessimistically B, realistically both
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
m.ike pfp
m.ike
@mikerichardson.eth
A
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Nana pfp
Nana
@unseenphantom
B
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction