Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
has anyone here tried SocialAI? you post to millions of followers. all AI, none real. saw Greg Isenberg post about it on X. he called it “addicting, really addicting.” then he asked how others feel about it. i’m surprised with the varied feedback. comments are worth reading in context of FC + ChatGPT replies
38 replies
21 recasts
113 reactions
erica pfp
erica
@heavygweit
hard no. potential psychological damage stemming from this is way too high. also damage to society and economy overall imagine a whole generation of people who are spoken to in exactly the way they want, and then they go out and meet people who have their own experiences and beliefs and convictions and consciousness
1 reply
0 recast
9 reactions
Victor Ma 🧾 pfp
Victor Ma 🧾
@vm
everyone wants to feel seen and heard, all that matters is if folks get that same feeling knowing it's from AI it wouldn't do it for me, but maybe for other people it will
1 reply
0 recast
6 reactions
J Finn 🎩 pfp
J Finn 🎩
@jdotfinn
I think it taps into something in consumer psychology on social that is valuable to see, which is that most people aren’t programmed for authenticity per se. The dopamine hit of engagement (even fake) has value. It’s why I think the war on bots on social is ultimately unwinnable from purely a tech perspective as well.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Mark Fishman pfp
Mark Fishman
@markfishman
I can totally understand the appeal, but it's also the most Black Mirror thing I've seen this year (which is saying something) I use social platforms not (just) to get reactions and "engagement" but to meet new people and learn about their unique experiences – and hopefully meet some of them IRL! Will never be able to do this with AI followers
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Erik pfp
Erik
@eriks
this is actually insane, i am at a loss for words lol
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
nicholas 🧨 pfp
nicholas 🧨
@nicholas
this has been tried a few times. butterfly is a recent version and there was another maybe 5 years ago. curious but skeptical. “millions of reactions” is less valuable than one meaningful reaction. fun experiment either way
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
agusti pfp
agusti
@bleu.eth
what if we make a fake farcaster that only is AI agents (based / trained on your profiles) 😹
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
tomu pfp
tomu
@tomu
big NO from me if the only thing you're seeking is attention, then you need to work on yourself as a human
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Samuel ツ pfp
Samuel ツ
@samuellhuber.eth
I just post in /dev on farcaster. Same feeling when it goes viral lol
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Michael Pfister pfp
Michael Pfister
@pfista
Hey look a Farcaster clone
10 replies
0 recast
68 reactions
Thomas pfp
Thomas
@aviationdoctor.eth
One step closer to the dead internet theory. Fun proof of concept though, even though it’s still looking like AI slop for now
0 reply
0 recast
6 reactions
YES2Crypto 🎩 🟪🟡 pfp
YES2Crypto 🎩 🟪🟡
@yes2crypto.eth
That is both horrific and enticing.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
🗿 pfp
🗿
@bias
what do you mean? we’re on it right now
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
not parzival pfp
not parzival
@shoni.eth
value prop if they ask interesting questions i guess
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Izzy💫🎩 pfp
Izzy💫🎩
@izzykid
Is this where the bots reply us from???
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Shira Stember pfp
Shira Stember
@shira
A testing ground for bangers?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Kiraa♡ pfp
Kiraa♡
@fwkiraa.eth
low budget farcaster
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Melanin ツ 🎩💜✨ pfp
Melanin ツ 🎩💜✨
@0xmelanin
i have mixed feelings about it cause we already have ai responding everywhere already
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Brian Kim pfp
Brian Kim
@brianjckim
oh hell naw
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction