Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
after the Lex x Beff pod, i am more skeptical of than persuaded by e/acc: -URL vibes are 1000% hyper masculine, but the IRL vibes are… not, to put it bluntly -the sense it was started as satire, unexpectedly took off w/o a strong foundation, and now they’ve doubled down due to sunk cost fallacy any counters? SOS
30 replies
13 recasts
68 reactions

Daniel Lombraña pfp
Daniel Lombraña
@teleyinex.eth
Don't read the a16 manifesto, or read it and get a bit mad. It starts more or less ok, and then it is just a list of extreme capitalism. They want to write the rules, they want to control the narrative. There's no optimism in there except for them.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
how do you think e/acc and the technoptimist movements intersect, overlap, diverge, etc.?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Daniel Lombraña pfp
Daniel Lombraña
@teleyinex.eth
The whole thing is that the a16 manifesto is about techno-optimism. e/acc and them overlap in the idea of not putting any constraints into the technology, so it can evolve, as they assume: technology will always bring good for humans.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Daniel Lombraña pfp
Daniel Lombraña
@teleyinex.eth
I'm not skipping this one. I'm thinking carefully about it.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction