Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
ted (not lasso)
@ted
why don’t people form small groups (3-5) around an interest, create a channel, and cast/reply to each other? it could: 1. amplify reach (shared audiences) 2. create richer, more dynamic discussions (shared effort) 3. build deeper connections maybe it feels like extra work or it’s hard to find each other?
31 replies
23 recasts
161 reactions
Joe Petrich 🟪
@jpetrich
I will say I've searched on Farcaster to see if there's a channel for something (Blueprint) and, not finding anything, decided not to cast about it because I doubted I'd get any interesting responses. Is it easy to create a channel these days?
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
ted (not lasso)
@ted
yeah, can still create somewhat easily (2500 warps)! not seeing the content is deterrent for me, too, whether it’s searching for a channel or searching for the content itself (warpcast has bad search so it often doesn’t get me what I want to see).
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
Chris Carlson
@chrislarsc.eth
/buoy for search 🤌 I used it yesterday to look up “digital fashion” and discovered some new accounts! We’re gonna kick off the discussion this week in /digital-fashion — plz join if you’re interested!
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
AJ
@awedjob
I have created 10 channels and counting. Responded to @ccarella.eth yesterday abt me being a serial domain name buyer. Whenever I have the inkling of an idea for something, I register a domain - but now I make a channel. I just made /hyperfy and already there’s 27 followers. Channels were an invaluable feature addition for WC. I agree with you that they are under-utilized. Perhaps if there was a “merge channels” option ppl would be willing to join forces. It is hard to build a community. The constantly shifting landscape of FC and WC add an order of complexity to that.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
