ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
why do we (society) obsess over and often hate tech billionaires but don’t bat an eye at music billionaires (taylor swift, jay Z), sports billionaires (magic johnson, lebron), or entertainment billionaires (george lucas, tyler perry)?
42 replies
21 recasts
48 reactions
rish pfp
rish
@rish
Tech disrupts industries which creates disagreements which in turn affects public perception Entertainment driven wealth doesn’t necessarily disrupt orthogonal industries (<celebrity> isn’t disrupting real estate with their investments in real estate) resulting in fewer disagreements and thus lesser conflict
1 reply
0 recast
8 reactions
Steve pfp
Steve
@sdv.eth
Apples and oranges imo. Tech billionaires are more like oil, telecom, and other business billionaires that create empires around infrastructure with tangible consequences to the layman. Music and sports *are* entertainment which we can opt in/out of consuming those products, and is generally inconsequential.
3 replies
0 recast
9 reactions
welter pfp
welter
@fun
i think because they see it as "business person taking advantage of others to make money" saying they don't deserve the money, the workers do in the eye of the public, tech people are closer to traditional business than athletes or musicians are most people don't think of "business" when they think of music or sports
1 reply
0 recast
9 reactions
netop://ウエハ pfp
netop://ウエハ
@netopwibby.eth
Entertainment billionaires require some semblance of talent and usually remember where they came from. Tech billionaires can nepo their way through life and have ridiculous world views.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Poison Ivy pfp
Poison Ivy
@ivy
Taylor swift, jay z, magic johnson, Lebron, George Lucas, and Tyler perry aren’t trying to reform society in their own images and don’t use phrases like ‘woke mind virus’
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ST pfp
ST
@vercelabloh
this is not society. this is the mainstream press. and there are [bad] reasons.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Sachin pfp
Sachin
@sach
apart from all the reasons mentioned, probably that tech billionaires are the least entertaining/charismatic of all the billionaires.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Mantej Rajpal 🇺🇸 pfp
Mantej Rajpal 🇺🇸
@mantej.eth
My hunch is that we (society) see tech billionaires as exploitative / using their power to influence policy and gain more power which cycles into more exploitation, contrast to LeBron who’s rich bc he’s good at basketball and we just love to watch him play
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
McBain pfp
McBain
@mcbain
The other type is bureaucrat billionaire. Someone who controls over a billion in public funds Why are some people so ok with that?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Mood affiliation. Start with people you don’t like and find characteristics to criticize them on.
1 reply
1 recast
11 reactions
Cameron Armstrong pfp
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
we didn't used to hate tech billionaires iirc that's like a past 10 years phenomenon
3 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
McBain pfp
McBain
@mcbain
For this I think it's because we understand at a viceral level Lebron or Taylor give to us. So we're happy they are rewarded Unless you're a business nerd it's hard to understand the value Twilio creates
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Est3la pfp
Est3la
@wayseeker
Because they are not jerks (or at least they appear not to be). Just to clarify, I don’t like any of them.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Nick Smith pfp
Nick Smith
@iamnick.eth
Music, sports and entertainment billionaires make us feel something magical. Tech billionaires generally manipulate our feelings 🤷
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Syed Shah🏴‍☠️🌊 pfp
Syed Shah🏴‍☠️🌊
@syed
Interesting question! Maybe it's the promise vs the delivery. Tech people say "we will make the world a better place!" So can be critiqued in this area. Entertainment people say "we will entertain you" and so are critiqued in this area.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Manuel pfp
Manuel
@manuelmaccou.eth
Oh I’ll hate on Tyler Perry. The entire Madea franchise set black people back hundreds of years.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Om Malik pfp
Om Malik
@ommalik
You have already gotten great replies and many of them are so good and so spot on. My 2c— and I wrote about this a few weeks back — the problem is that tech billionaires (or at least some of them) often wade into areas where they shouldn’t and have no expertise & come across as evil & selfish.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
nicholas 🧨 pfp
nicholas 🧨
@nicholas
Balaji’s recent episode on MoZ with @dwr.eth where he contrasts the scale of expenditure of large companies/billionaires and large governments was pretty stark revelation. Companies are nowhere as big as the biggest governments.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
tldr (tim reilly) pfp
tldr (tim reilly)
@tldr
Very interesting question Arendt observed that groups attract violent hatred when (1) they have some perceived political power but (2) do not have total political power (Without #1 you are a non-threat. With #2 you must be respected) Checks out w Dixie Chicks? They got hated when they made a political effect
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction