Sylve pfp

Sylve

@sylve

176 Following
478 Followers


Sylve pfp
Sylve
@sylve
we should honeypot the north korean hackers. create a fake company, hire a bunch of them, have them fight each other to try and get access to the funds this is EV+ for the cia
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Sylve pfp
Sylve
@sylve
cc @rutefig
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Sylve pfp
Sylve
@sylve
Proof of residency using SP1 and @hyle-org built by the talented Rute! Extending the trust you put in digital signatures is fantastic for accessibility. Kudos to the ATCud signature system in Portugal which enables signed invoices! https://x.com/_rutefig/status/1868674006616047921
2 replies
11 recasts
59 reactions

Sylve pfp
Sylve
@sylve
mom i made the list
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Sylve pfp
Sylve
@sylve
what's missing in your opinion?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Sylve pfp
Sylve
@sylve
damn that's hopeful
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Sylve pfp
Sylve
@sylve
what's everyone's thought on Brave's Distefano? Is it just the proxy model with extra steps and TLS 1.3? cc @eulerlagrange.eth https://x.com/brave/status/1864358727916142636
3 replies
12 recasts
79 reactions

Sylve pfp
Sylve
@sylve
thx Gina <3
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Sylve pfp
Sylve
@sylve
Interested to know more 👀
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Sylve pfp
Sylve
@sylve
The 4 data genders: - unencrypted & closed-off data: facebook, telegram - encrypted & closed-off data: signal, whatsapp - unencrypted & open data: ethereum, wikipedia - encrypted & open data: 👀👀👀
2 replies
11 recasts
81 reactions

Sylve pfp
Sylve
@sylve
I like ideas like semantic zkTLS for https://tmr.news/: use an external LLM to give a subjective idea of "how close you were" That doesn't have to be zkified imo, you can just use signatures for it
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Sylve pfp
Sylve
@sylve
How do you picture dumb contracts interacting with the valuable subjective world? I believe zk-ifying oracles is one way to do it, i wonder if you're looking at anything else
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Sylve pfp
Sylve
@sylve
I do the exact same hahaha
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Sylve pfp
Sylve
@sylve
And I think you wrote "sgx" not "sxg" hahha
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Sylve pfp
Sylve
@sylve
Oh man I had no clue forbes.it and buymeacoffee.com had SXG enabled You can prolly rebuild tmr.news with zkp+sxg without additional trust assumptions over zkTLS
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Sylve pfp
Sylve
@sylve
Oi
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Sylve pfp
Sylve
@sylve
soup inbound 🍲
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Sylve pfp
Sylve
@sylve
founding a company like
0 reply
2 recasts
5 reactions

Sylve pfp
Sylve
@sylve
You can't write zero-knowledge proof without "ow" and "oof"
0 reply
1 recast
7 reactions

Sylve pfp
Sylve
@sylve
It's the only misconception worth discussing. Blockchain for strict global consensus. And for everything else, there's mastercard (validium, zk-servers). But aside from bad faith I think the main reason this confusion happens is because blockchain is such a strong concept to latch onto that it's difficult to imagine anything else being possible. That's why we believe blockchain invented the word decentralized.
1 reply
5 recasts
6 reactions