So you don’t buy the meme that AGI would prefer to operate on blockchains rails because of their universality, security, programmability, etc.?

AGI will decisively obsolete blockchains, but it's likely it'll be obsolete for all but 1 or 2 usecases well before then (few years) as non-blockchain P2P, ZK, trust infrastructure develops

Where blockchains are limited to only objective strict consensus, AGI(s) can achieve complex, subjective consensus - "AGI will use blockchains" is a silly, nonsensical meme not unlike "telegraphs will use internet" 

Valuable cryptoassets like BTC and ETH will live on after blockchains are obsolete because, as I've said a hundred times before, this is a socioeconomic movement, and tech is only means to an end. The tech will be replaced, the socioeconomics will live on.

Caveat: "AGI" is in itself a meme, so I'm assuming it'll do what people popularly expect

near-AGI agents achieving subjective consensus is likely, but wouldn't they need to post their "state" to an objective strict consensus layer periodically? 

Otherwise how can, say, multiple AGI agents work together over extended period of time?

From a user PoV, wouldn't payments, physical and digital asset ownership, legal contracts etc need to be posted to a "objective and final" layer for there to be trust in ownership of these assets?

Very thought provoking post though!