https://twitter.com/WSJTech/status/1755774564896756101

This feels very counterproductive?

Like, from an "AI safety" perspective, scaling current techniques to even bigger compute -> earlier superintelligence -> more risk.

And from an "AI openness" perspective, it increases the divide between megacorps and plebs.

> earlier super intelligence -> more risk

Why? Seems like an unfair default framing

Earlier super intelligence = automated crop production, faster therapies for chronic illnesses, life extension, colonisation of near space etc all of which dramatically extend humanities p(survival beyond the next 100 years)