Farcaster

video related dev alpha from supercast groupchat this morning

farcaster is not sustainable if merkle gets all the funding and does not pass that on to other developers. 

you can either centralize funding and development or decentralize both. you can’t centralize funding and maintain motivation for decentralized development.

this reminds me to watch this video that @samuellhuber.eth recommended and said addressed the plan for the funding (which recently seems to be sitting tranquilly in the coffers)

Developer 🤓 build, develop and operate Farcaster solutions @ dtech.vision also love tech, decentralization, fitness and oldschool rap 😎

/bettik founder /outercorps stalwart | ex-binance, ex-celsiusX

working on /microsub + @degentipbot.eth; producer/dj; host of /campfire 🎧 + /downshift ⚙️

this reminds me to watch this video that @samuellhuber.eth recommended and said addressed the plan for the funding (which recently seems to be sitting tranquilly in the coffers) https://youtu.be/yGY2DxHQ55Y?si=UclvQ2__cMBNZI0f

appreciate the transparency. no pressure to reveal what your funding sources would be, but if it isn’t merkle, the problem still remains that they suck up the vast majority of farcaster funding and yet still expect devs like you to exist and scrounge around for the remaining scraps of funding sources interested in the space. 

let me know if this is not the case because that is what it appears to be in the eyes of most people looking in to farcaster development.

fwiw i have access to funding, just don't want to take it

other founders in my position would take different action and probably would add video support much faster

in other words — skill issue on my end

I just honestly don't understand how 'good content is our number 1 goal' and 'we're not allowing 1 of the most dominant forms of content' align.