Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ponder Surveys pfp
Ponder Surveys
@survey
Question by @cojo.eth 🎩 Vote to join 75K DEGEN weekly giveaway πŸ”” Follow & turn on notifs for new surveys https://weponder.io/farcaster/surveys/275
15 replies
4 recasts
10 reactions
Ponder Surveys pfp
Ponder Surveys
@survey
Survey has ended after 48 hours and received 206 votes.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Chukwuka Osakwe pfp
Chukwuka Osakwe
@chukwukaosakwe
4. But I'm answering this question through the limited lenses of /football and /frontend, channels where it's pretty easy to arrive at a universally consensus on whether a cast is spam or not.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
iSpeakNerd πŸ§™β€β™‚οΈ pfp
iSpeakNerd πŸ§™β€β™‚οΈ
@ispeaknerd.eth
depends on level of "fuck it we ball" you want /tabletop is very niche but big channel, focus on quality posts with images/discussion posts. very little crypto stuff, wish had on-topic crypto tbh. kind of a PoM (Proof of Meeple) to post in there atm vs /replyguys very spammy imo but gets lots traction Β―\_(ツ)_/Β―
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Colin Johnson πŸ’­ pfp
Colin Johnson πŸ’­
@cojo.eth
This was actually kind of hard to answer. Spam sucks but authoritarianism does too.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Ben Adamsky πŸ’­ pfp
Ben Adamsky πŸ’­
@ba
Spam is definitely a concern, but we need to make sure we don't stifle farcaster culture in an attempt to reduce it
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
matt πŸ’­ pfp
matt πŸ’­
@matthewmorek
I think a balanced approach is needed. Or moderation tools need to be deployed to let the community police it themselves, on the individual level. If this is even possible.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
netop://ウエハ pfp
netop://ウエハ
@netopwibby.eth
2 or 3 is the correct answer
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Ghostlinkz pfp
Ghostlinkz
@ghostlinkz.eth
Users should just be able to mute channels so that they never see a cast made in a channel they don’t care about. As for spam in the channel, it should be up to the channel founders to set the tone. Some mods will be strict and others will value feedback from existing community members.
0 reply
1 recast
2 reactions
kripcat.eth 🎩 pfp
kripcat.eth 🎩
@kripcat.eth
4. Since much of web2 social is overrun with spam being strong on spam here is a good way to differentiate. Also seems more important here because of the strong financial incentive to spam in web3 & since FC is shaping up to be the face of consumer crypto in this new cycle. We want FC reflect the best of crypto.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Brad Wilde pfp
Brad Wilde
@bwilde
πŸ‘€ on anyone with a neon-green background that answers this. Just saying. πŸ™Š
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Brad Wilde pfp
Brad Wilde
@bwilde
Leaning towards 3; spam is absolute garbage, but also don't know of a utilitarian way to remove it.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Akinetic βš”οΈ pfp
Akinetic βš”οΈ
@wealthmagnet.eth
Spam mute is the solution.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Romain pfp
Romain
@greedywizard
It feels awkward to moderate the content layer as it invariably leads to people getting up in arms about the result. Recommendation algorithms should be more transparent and customisable so everyone gets their sweet spot
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Tuomas Pigg pfp
Tuomas Pigg
@tuomaspigg
I would lean towards rather censoring spam more than less. Its poisoning so many socialfi projects.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction