Here are the ~2.5K "Unlikely to engage in spammy behavior" (i.e. value = 2) accounts being followed by @bleu.eth (left) vs. the ~6.8K accounts that are following @bleu.eth (right)

There are 40K+ (value = 2) accounts in the map with 8.2 million following/followers relationships between them represented

Low-hanging fruit: identifying a cluster of ~500 inauthentic accounts among the 40K+ accounts that Warpcast has labeled "Unlikely to engage in spammy behavior" (examples: @champy @007kg @bejita @ashur @chanin @ep15 @farook @allplay @5023 @darika)

A cat lover who interested in cryptocurrency and ETH development

Phai Cham Sin, Wiset Chai Chan District, Ang Thong 14110, Thailand

ฟอลมา ฟอลกลับ ทุกคนจ้า

My Name is AllPlay. I love Playing everything on crypto,NFT and GameFi

คนไทยครับช่วยกัน follow 


Hi ฟอลมา ฟอลกลับ 100%

Low-hanging fruit: identifying a cluster of ~500 inauthentic accounts among the 40K+ accounts that Warpcast has labeled "Unlikely to engage in spammy behavior" (examples: @champy @007kg @bejita @ashur @chanin @ep15 @farook @allplay @5023 @darika) https://warpcast.com/geoffgolberg/0xf81db2a4

I like running, poker and oysters | Founder, Social Forensics (SocialForensics.com) | Berkeley & UPenn | Learning to listen

What causes them to be clustered like that? F4F?

F4F and their inability to get authentic accounts to follow them back