Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
This is a good decision. Preferenxe falsification is a big problem in society and we need to see people's honest views. It would be really cool if Farcaster follows it, by implementing ZK likes. Can probably borrow technology from zupoll. https://x.com/wanghaofei/status/1793096366132195529
234 replies
1853 recasts
6740 reactions
Sriram Krishnan
@sriramk.eth
Strong agree with this. Also think follow graphs should be private for similar reasons. Fought for this at X but never managed to get it done.
7 replies
3 recasts
39 reactions
will
@w
i get a tremendous amount of value out of seeing *who i follow that follows someone* for a quick & dirty legitimacy check (and occasional back channel)
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
timbeiko.eth
@tim
Interesting PoV! FWIW, I'd say 25%+ of the value I get out of Twitter is actually looking through my follows' likes. 50% is replies, and 25% is raw tweets.
0 reply
0 recast
19 reactions
Chinmay 🕹️🍿
@chinmay.eth
If the follow graph is private, it's hard to build the interoperability.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Michael Shynar
@shmichael
And we should remove poster identities down the line. ZK prove you are an expert on the topic you are posting about.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Shravan
@eldandishravan
Yes, I agree brother.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Zenigame
@zeni.eth
I dont know how hard it'd be technically or ux-wise, but privacy toggles here sound great
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
The Technocrat
@thetechnocrat
I like being able to balance my own search for social media content with whatever algo the app's feed uses. Follow graphs are one of the most useful self search avenues for content imo.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
